2019
DOI: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-4-586-593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of protein secondary structure calculation methods based on infrared spectra deconvolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the second derivative, the FSD method, and curve fitting, applied in analyzing the protein spectra, gives reasonable results for the protein secondary structure [19], consistent with each other and with X-ray data [20]. Besides, the second derivative, despite the subjectivity of determining the baseline for the derivative of the spectrum [21], has enormous advantages (it separates the components of amide I without any arbitrary input factors, such as the band half-width and enhancement factor) and gives a more accurate result [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the second derivative, the FSD method, and curve fitting, applied in analyzing the protein spectra, gives reasonable results for the protein secondary structure [19], consistent with each other and with X-ray data [20]. Besides, the second derivative, despite the subjectivity of determining the baseline for the derivative of the spectrum [21], has enormous advantages (it separates the components of amide I without any arbitrary input factors, such as the band half-width and enhancement factor) and gives a more accurate result [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The protein spectra used for analysis were obtained by subtracting the spectra of an aqueous solution using Opus 7.0 software. The secondary structure was determined by decomposing the second derivative of the amide I band in the OriginPro 2015 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA), by the method described in [20,22]. All second derivatives were multiplied by −1 for easy decomposition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%