2004
DOI: 10.1029/2003jd003777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Common Land Model

Abstract: [1] This paper compares by land cover type seasonal and spatial variations of MODIS leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (0.4-0.7 mm) absorbed by vegetation (FPAR) from 2.5 years with those from the Common Land Model (CLM) and investigates possible reasons for notable differences. The FPAR value is mainly determined by LAI in MODIS and both LAI and stem area index (SAI) in CLM. On average, the model underestimates FPAR in the Southern Hemisphere and overestimates FPAR over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve credible results, these models must be systematically parameterized, calibrated and evaluated using independent observations at multiple spatial and temporal scales [13][14][15]. The rapidly increasing availability of remote sensing data has created unique opportunities for validating and improving these land surface models, especially at global and regional scales [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve credible results, these models must be systematically parameterized, calibrated and evaluated using independent observations at multiple spatial and temporal scales [13][14][15]. The rapidly increasing availability of remote sensing data has created unique opportunities for validating and improving these land surface models, especially at global and regional scales [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed simulations are needed to validate the estimates derived in this study, particularly as improved models (Dai et al 2003;Tian et al 2004) and accurate high resolution surface albedo data (Justice et al 1998;Schaaf et al 2002) are now becoming available. Higher resolution coupled modelling using GCM and RCM methodologies and accurately measured location-specific urban and grassland surface albedo values, remains desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we have conducted experiments using the BiosphereAtmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS; Dickinson et al, 1993;Yang et al, 1997) as the option for snow surface albedo. We have also used the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS; Verseghy, 1991;Verseghy et al, 1993) with new vegetation parameters for testing model performance of albedo. In terms of the albedo options in the Noah-MP, the CLASS scheme simply computes the overall snow albedo depending on fresh snow albedo and snow age while the BATS one calculates snow albedo for direct and diffuse radiation in visible and near-infrared broadband accounting for several additional parameters such as grain size growth, impurity, and especially solar zenith angle (SZA) .…”
Section: The Noah-mpmentioning
confidence: 99%