2012
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2012.2201956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Single Event Transients Generated at Four Pulsed-Laser Test Facilities-NRL, IMS, EADS, JPL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests involved measuring SET amplitude and collected charge as a function of applied bias, laser pulse energy and focused spot size. Moreover, a comparison of the SETs obtained from heavy ions with those from pulsed laser light at NRL and EADS showed very similar results with Ar ions with LET 10 MeV·cm 2 /mg [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tests involved measuring SET amplitude and collected charge as a function of applied bias, laser pulse energy and focused spot size. Moreover, a comparison of the SETs obtained from heavy ions with those from pulsed laser light at NRL and EADS showed very similar results with Ar ions with LET 10 MeV·cm 2 /mg [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We use the same photodiode than in [5] as a test vehicle, a Centronic OSD15-5T having dimensions of 3.8 mm 3.8 mm and optical sensitivity peaked at 800 nm. The laser pulses were directed at the front surface of the photodiode to produce SETs under a variety of conditions.…”
Section: A Test Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wavelength of the pulsed laser microbeam and the size of the focused spot are considered to be the two main factors, [13] and pulsed lasers with wavelengths of 1064 nm and 532 nm were selected. Firstly, the interdigital region of the device was scanned by a pulsed laser to determine the more sensitive region.…”
Section: Setting Of Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irradiation caused increases in interface state densities, as well as input, output and reverse transfer capacitances with increasing accumulated doses. [239][240][241][242][243][244][245] Displacement damage effects 24,72,99 on forward bias I-V of SiC commercial 4H-SiC Schottky diodes exposed to 203 MeV protons revealed that the diodes showed excellent resistance to radiation damage at fluences up to 2.5 × 10 14 p cm −2 . There were only minor changes in the reverse bias I-Vs with the reverse leakage decreasing with increasing irradiation fluence, while in forward bias, the sheet resistance R S increased as fluence increases.…”
Section: Total Dose and Single Event Upsetmentioning
confidence: 99%