2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of structural, thermal and proton conductivity properties of micro- and nanocelluloses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 †). Recently, Jankowska et al showed that lms made of nanocellulose had higher proton conductivity compared to the ones made of larger microcellulose, 24 supporting our results that highlight the importance of high aspect ratio nanobers and well dened and homogenous membrane structures (achievable by controlled slow drying conditions). Aer the fuel cell evaluation, the physicochemical characterization (including SAXS, XRD and IR) show no signicant alteration in their chemistry, crystallinity or microstructure (see ESI, Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S1 †). Recently, Jankowska et al showed that lms made of nanocellulose had higher proton conductivity compared to the ones made of larger microcellulose, 24 supporting our results that highlight the importance of high aspect ratio nanobers and well dened and homogenous membrane structures (achievable by controlled slow drying conditions). Aer the fuel cell evaluation, the physicochemical characterization (including SAXS, XRD and IR) show no signicant alteration in their chemistry, crystallinity or microstructure (see ESI, Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this regard, thanks to their chemical stability, advantageous mechanical and optical properties, environmental benignity, availability and versatility in the manufactory process, 16,17 the use of cellulose nanomaterials in energy applications such as lithium ion batteries [18][19][20][21][22] and PEMFC itself 23,24 has increased dramatically in recent years. [25][26][27] Several different types of nanocelluloses 16 have been investigated in PEMFCs: bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes have shown a low conductivity z 0.008 mS cm À1 at 40 C and 98% RH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study showed that the composites with the incorporation of CNF presented a better thermal stability than the CNC/soy protein isolate nanocomposites. The lower thermal stability of CNC‐incorporated composites could be attributed to the high surface area of CNC, which led to a larger exposure to heat and the partial disruption in the cellulose crystal structure …”
Section: Thermal Properties Of Nanocellulose Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon later, a detailed study of anhydrous proton conduction in different types of nanocellulose was performed by Jankowska et al (Figure 7) (Jankowska et al, 2018). They investigated the relationship between microstructure and proton conductivity at temperature range from 60 to 210°C.…”
Section: Cellulose-based Pems Pristine Cellulosic Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%