2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1435-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effect of rose bengal- and eosin Y-mediated photodynamic inactivation on planktonic cells and biofilms of Candida albicans

Abstract: Candida albicans is an opportunistic yeast that can cause oral candidosis through the formation of a biofilm, an important virulence factor that compromises the action of antifungal agents. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of rose bengal (RB)- and eosin Y (EY)-mediated photodynamic inactivation (PDI) using a green light-emitting diode (LED; 532 ± 10 nm) on planktonic cells and biofilms of C. albicans (ATCC 18804). Planktonic cultures were treated with photosensitizers at concentrations ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Freire et al [34] compared Rose Bengal (RB) with Eosin Y (2,4,5,7 tetrabromofluorescein) assessing their potency for photoinactivation of Candida albicans biofilms. After culturing these biofilms for 48 h, treatment was done with 200 μM RB or Eosin Y for 5 min as a pre-irradiation period and subsequent illumination with a green LED (90mW; 532±10nm) for 180s (light dose: 42.63J/cm2; applied energy: 16.2J), which resulted in inactivation rates of 0.22 and 0.45 log 10 for RB and Eosin Y, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freire et al [34] compared Rose Bengal (RB) with Eosin Y (2,4,5,7 tetrabromofluorescein) assessing their potency for photoinactivation of Candida albicans biofilms. After culturing these biofilms for 48 h, treatment was done with 200 μM RB or Eosin Y for 5 min as a pre-irradiation period and subsequent illumination with a green LED (90mW; 532±10nm) for 180s (light dose: 42.63J/cm2; applied energy: 16.2J), which resulted in inactivation rates of 0.22 and 0.45 log 10 for RB and Eosin Y, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has to be considered that blue light from a 455 nm LED may not be optimal for excitation of ERY and RB with green light being more appropriate (Pereira et al, 2013). In a study from the same group, Freire et al (2013) compared RB with Eosin Y (2,4,5,7-tetrabromofluorescein) concerning their potency for inactivation of Candida albicans biofilms. After culturing these biofilms for 48 h, treatment was done with 200 μ M RB or Eosin Y for 5 min as a pre-irradiation period and subsequent illumination with a green LED (90 mW; 532±10 nm) for 180 s (light dose: 42.63 J/cm 2 ; applied energy: 16.2 J), which resulted in inactivation rates of 0.22 and 0.45 log 10 for RB and Eosin Y, respectively (Freire et al, 2013).…”
Section: Apdt Against Biofilms In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study from the same group, Freire et al (2013) compared RB with Eosin Y (2,4,5,7-tetrabromofluorescein) concerning their potency for inactivation of Candida albicans biofilms. After culturing these biofilms for 48 h, treatment was done with 200 μ M RB or Eosin Y for 5 min as a pre-irradiation period and subsequent illumination with a green LED (90 mW; 532±10 nm) for 180 s (light dose: 42.63 J/cm 2 ; applied energy: 16.2 J), which resulted in inactivation rates of 0.22 and 0.45 log 10 for RB and Eosin Y, respectively (Freire et al, 2013). In contrast to those results, Kishen et al achieved a high killing efficacy of approximately 5 log 10 steps, when using RB against Enterococcus faecalis monospecies biofilms, as mentioned above (see Chapter Phenothiazinium Derivatives) (Kishen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Apdt Against Biofilms In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eosin Y was selected as a photosensitizer because it absorbs blue light and was previously shown to inactivate Lactobacilli and Candida albicans upon light activation [14,15]. Intermittent irradiation consisted in exposing pathogens to light and photosensitizer first, then re-incubating pathogens for a certain period of time before repeating the irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%