2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2004.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
68
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the overall sensitivity of urine PCR for the diagnosis of CL was sub-optimal compared with the very sensitive molecular assays on invasively obtained scrapings and biopsies of cutaneous and mucosal lesions, [1][2][3][4][5] the presence of detectable kDNA in the urine may suggest a potential role in categorizing patients as candidates for different therapies, especially given the over-representation of mucosal disease in the group with detectable kDNA in the urine. Given the toxicity associated with currently used parenteral therapies for CL (such as pentavalent antimonials and amphotericin B), 1 , 25 there is a movement toward use of topical therapies such as paromomycin, [26][27][28][29][30] cryo-or thermotherapy, [31][32][33] or intralesional antimonials. [32][33][34] However, patients with detectable kDNA in urine may represent a group of patients with less localized forms of disease that may be most amenable to systemic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the overall sensitivity of urine PCR for the diagnosis of CL was sub-optimal compared with the very sensitive molecular assays on invasively obtained scrapings and biopsies of cutaneous and mucosal lesions, [1][2][3][4][5] the presence of detectable kDNA in the urine may suggest a potential role in categorizing patients as candidates for different therapies, especially given the over-representation of mucosal disease in the group with detectable kDNA in the urine. Given the toxicity associated with currently used parenteral therapies for CL (such as pentavalent antimonials and amphotericin B), 1 , 25 there is a movement toward use of topical therapies such as paromomycin, [26][27][28][29][30] cryo-or thermotherapy, [31][32][33] or intralesional antimonials. [32][33][34] However, patients with detectable kDNA in urine may represent a group of patients with less localized forms of disease that may be most amenable to systemic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some topical dosage forms studied for CL topical treatment that should be mentioned are a paromomycin (PA) ointment (14), and a PA/urea ointment (15), but no significant cure of the lesions was observed with these treatments. In animals experimentally infected by Leishmania amazonensis or L.major, the activity of formulations containing only PA is usually low (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With MA, the expected clinical cure rate in immunocompetent individuals is 91.7%, as demonstrated in a study undertaken in the same geographical area where the patient became infected. 15 Furthermore, most of the patients infected in the Pacific coastal region of Ecuador will selfcure after a Leishmania infection, as demonstrated in a study where a high number of patients were cured without drug treatment. 16 It is well known that treatment response to antimonials in Leishmania-HIV coinfections tends to be poor (33-82%), 2,17 with a relapse rate of 14-57%, and a high mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%