2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of theoretical methods for assessing the heat of formation of C1 and C2 chlorofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that with the fast developments in computer technology and quantum chemistry method, theoretical prediction of thermodynamic properties has become a realistic tool and has arisen a lot of interest [28,33,[35][36][37][38]. The study [37] on the HOF of hydrochlorofluoromethanes using the G3 procedure showed that the mean-absolute-deviation of the calculated results was only 4 kJ mol −1 , smaller than that of G2 (13 kJ mol −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that with the fast developments in computer technology and quantum chemistry method, theoretical prediction of thermodynamic properties has become a realistic tool and has arisen a lot of interest [28,33,[35][36][37][38]. The study [37] on the HOF of hydrochlorofluoromethanes using the G3 procedure showed that the mean-absolute-deviation of the calculated results was only 4 kJ mol −1 , smaller than that of G2 (13 kJ mol −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the G3 procedure was less computational demanding than G2. The HOFs of a number of chlorofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons calculated using the G3 and G3X methods from the atomization reaction and isodesmic reaction indicated that the results yielded from the isodesmic reaction are better [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the primary cause of the sizable errors in the values of calculated by the formation of CH x Cl y for molecular structures containing three or more chlorine atoms. The calculations of for CH x Cl y (y > 2) on the basis of the G3-energy for the atomization reaction reproduce the experimental estimates considerably better [3437]. The greatest difference between the calculated and experimental value of occurs for CCl 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of the difficulty in obtaining the single‐point energy at the MP2/6‐311++G** level for compound 8 , the gas‐phase enthalpy of 8 was calculated by using the bond additive correction method (Scheme ) 13. The gas‐phase heat of formation of 3,5‐dimethyl‐1,2,4‐triazole (DMT) is calculated to be 211 kJ mol −1 , and that of 7 is calculated to be 921 kJ mol −1 , which is 710 kJ mol −1 (Scheme ) higher than DMT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the introduction of each additional N 3 group increases the value of the heat of formation by 355 kJ mol −1 . Based on the additive method,13 the gas‐phase heat of formation for 8 is 2017 kJ mol −1 , which was obtained by adding four azide groups from 3,3′,5,5′‐tetramethyl‐4,4′‐azo‐1,2,4‐triazole (TMAT, Scheme ). The corresponding solid phase heat of formation for 8 is 1940 kJ mol −1 using Trouton’s rule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%