1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19970404)64:1<191::aid-app17>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of thermal techniques for glass transition assignment. II. Commercial polymers

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The differential scanning calorimetry glass transition (DSC T g ), measured by ASTM test method E-1356, and the dynamic mechanical analysis glass transition (DMA T g ), measured using a new definition of the DMA T g , generally agree within {4ЊC for a wide variety of commercially available polymers. The DMA T g is defined as the average of EЉ and tan d peak temperatures measured at a 1 rad/s oscillation frequency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achorn et al suggest a method to decrease the difference between the DSC and DMTA values by adopting a new DMTA T g definition. [37][38] A much deeper understanding of the relationship between different measures of the glass transition is necessary, but it is not within the scope of the research done here.…”
Section: Physical Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achorn et al suggest a method to decrease the difference between the DSC and DMTA values by adopting a new DMTA T g definition. [37][38] A much deeper understanding of the relationship between different measures of the glass transition is necessary, but it is not within the scope of the research done here.…”
Section: Physical Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the onset of the thermal transition from a glassy to elastomeric material occurs at approximately the same temperature and the rubbery moduli, which are proportional to the crosslink density, are similar. The temperature at the tan δ maximum (assigned here as the T g )2223 demonstrates that both allyl and propyl sulfide-based materials exhibit super-ambient T g s (allyl sulfide-based system: 41 ± 1ºC, propyl sulfide-based system: 39 ± 1ºC ). Overall, the similarity of these networks indicates that the propyl sulfide addition to the MeDTBY enables this system to serve as an excellent control for which the only significant differences in material behavior should all be related to the simultaneous AFCT-polymerization mechanism rather than differences in the network structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAEs for the predicted results estimated by SVR were less than those of QSPR for both the training set and validation set. Thus, the prediction errors for the calculations based on [8,34,35] or even over 10 degrees [36] in T g values of a polymer measured by different experimental techniques. These imply that the established SVR model can be used, in practice, to satisfactorily predict the T g of an unknown structurally similar polymer outside of the training set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%