2015 20th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/mmar.2015.7283968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two efficient control strategies for two-wheeled balancing robot

Abstract: Abstract-The subject of this paper is a two-wheeled balancing robot with the center of mass above its wheels. Two control strategies for this robot are analyzed. The first one combines a kinematic model of the robot and a PI controller. The second one is a cascade of two PIDs. These strategies are compared experimentally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the displacements of the wheel along the x-axis and the rotational angle of the wheel about the y-axis is: (10) On the other hand, the relationship between the heading angle ( ) of the robot about the z-axis and the displacement of the wheel along the x-axis is: (11) By subtracting (1) and (2) from (3) and (4) respectively then substituting it to (11) result in:…”
Section: Research Methods 21 Mathematical Modeling Of the Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between the displacements of the wheel along the x-axis and the rotational angle of the wheel about the y-axis is: (10) On the other hand, the relationship between the heading angle ( ) of the robot about the z-axis and the displacement of the wheel along the x-axis is: (11) By subtracting (1) and (2) from (3) and (4) respectively then substituting it to (11) result in:…”
Section: Research Methods 21 Mathematical Modeling Of the Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], dynamics was derived using a Newtonian approach and the control was design by the equations linearized around an operating point. In [7][8][9], and [10] a linear stabilizing Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controller was derived by a planar model without considering robot's heading angle. The above control law was designed by a planar model without considering robot's heading angle therefore still cannot be implemented into a real system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since such balancing robot is a nonlinear system with nonholonomic constraints and inherent unstability, several control methods have been proposed for effective control. Among them, the control of a balancing robot through PID control is most basic and general control method [4], [5], [6]. However, many trials and errors and much time are needed in the process of tuning gains, and whenever the system is changed, new gains should be found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between two methods is presented by [8]. The first method is a cascade of a PI controller and a mathematical model of the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%