2019 16th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iceee.2019.8884571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Internal Miller Compensation Techniques for LDO Regulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under normal circumstances, the power consumption and response speed of LDO are opposite design indicators, and it is difficult to ensure low power consumption while also having a fast transient response [5] . Therefore, the low power consumption bandgap reference is used to design the circuit to reduce the overall power consumption, and a load detection circuit is used to detect whether the LDO is loaded to switch between heavy and heavy loads, thereby reducing the static current when there is no load and achieving the purpose of energy saving [6] .…”
Section: Low Power Consumption Fast Response Ldomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal circumstances, the power consumption and response speed of LDO are opposite design indicators, and it is difficult to ensure low power consumption while also having a fast transient response [5] . Therefore, the low power consumption bandgap reference is used to design the circuit to reduce the overall power consumption, and a load detection circuit is used to detect whether the LDO is loaded to switch between heavy and heavy loads, thereby reducing the static current when there is no load and achieving the purpose of energy saving [6] .…”
Section: Low Power Consumption Fast Response Ldomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Miller capacitor C1 pushes the secondary pole to a frequency point greater than the unit-gain bandwidth, and the zeroing resistor R1 pushes the zero far beyond the secondary pole so that it does not affect the gain attenuation rate. In this design, the low-frequency gain is expected to be 80 dB and the phase margin is to be 63° [5] . Figure 4 shows the design structure of the adjusting tube, which provides two guarantees for the stability of LDO.…”
Section: Bandgap Reference Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main pole is designed to be located at the output node of the error amplifier. For the stability of the system, a compensation capacitor C M is added [6] .…”
Section: Ldo Circuit Designmentioning
confidence: 99%