1985
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(85)90008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various Monte Carlo schemes for simulation of low-energy electron transport in matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,18), were performed using the direct Monte Carlo scheme (for details see 19,20). The basic assumptions used in this scheme are: 1) the electrons interact at random point.s in the bulk of the t.arget; 2) the type of interaction (e.g.…”
Section: The Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,18), were performed using the direct Monte Carlo scheme (for details see 19,20). The basic assumptions used in this scheme are: 1) the electrons interact at random point.s in the bulk of the t.arget; 2) the type of interaction (e.g.…”
Section: The Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation of the charging phenomenon relies on understanding of its fundamental physical mechanism; to this end, Cazaux has done a series of works from a theoretical perspective [18][19][20]. Because charging is closely related to the dynamical interaction between charged particles and a sample, a Monte Carlo simulation method-which has been demonstrated to be a powerful tool to study the static interaction between electrons and conductive solids [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]-should also be useful in theoretical investigation of charging problems, once a reasonable physical model for dynamic interaction is put forward. Various authors have already undertaken studies on different charging problems related to electron beam irradiation by using a Monte Carlo method [33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCNP, EGS/ BEAM, GEANT, ITS, FLUKA, PENELOPE) which adopt an effective electron energy cut-off (>0.1-1 keV) and an artificial transport-step. A fully microscopic, event-by-event, scheme presents a challenge in terms of low-energy electron interaction physics, since the details of the electronic structure of the target become critical at this range (2) . In that respect, it is important to account for distinctive features of condensed media relative to gases, such as (3) (1) the long-range polarisation of the material and screening of the projectile's field, which leads to weaker scattering probabilities, especially at low incident energies; (2) the collective transitions because of the large electronic density, which results in stronger absorption probabilities at certain energy losses and (3) the lower ionisation thresholds because of quasi-free electron states in the conduction band and the general shifting of the absorption spectrum to higher losses, which lead to a higher ionisation efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%