2020
DOI: 10.3897/folmed.62.e48930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Volumetric Dimensions of Pharyngeal Airway for Different Dentofacial Skeletal Patterns Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract: Introduction: After a century of controversies, we are still not certain on the relationship between airway volume and facial morphology. Objective: To measure nasopharyngeal airway volume and compare it among different skeletal patterns. Materials and methods: Forty five CBCT scans of patients between sixteen to twenty five years were used in the study. The nasopharyngeal airway was divided into upper, middle and lower segments. CBCT images were grouped into skeletal class I, class II and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies supported the association between skeletal pattern and the airway, while others did not show such a relationship. A study by Jadhav et al [6] demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the total airway volume and three sagittal skeletal groups. Alhammadi et al [7] reported that the volume of the palatopharyngeal and glossopharyngeal airways and the narrowest point of the palatopharyngeal airway were greater in Class II skeletal than in other skeletal groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies supported the association between skeletal pattern and the airway, while others did not show such a relationship. A study by Jadhav et al [6] demonstrated that there was no significant correlation between the total airway volume and three sagittal skeletal groups. Alhammadi et al [7] reported that the volume of the palatopharyngeal and glossopharyngeal airways and the narrowest point of the palatopharyngeal airway were greater in Class II skeletal than in other skeletal groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…28,29 No significant differences were found among the skeletal malocclusions for the volumes of the upper airways, which is also in line with prior researches. 21,[30][31][32] Other previous authors found a relationship between the upper airway volume and skeletal malocclusion. [33][34][35] Nevertheless, it is not possible to directly compare the results because the methodologies applied in these studies are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%