2018
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ZnO nanofillers of different shapes on physical, thermal and gas transport properties of PEBA membrane: experimental testing and molecular simulation

Abstract: BACKGROUND PEBA and nano‐ZnO have been discussed for membrane modification and for gas separation in different studies and in mixed matrix membranes (i.e. PEBA/TiO2, PE/ZnO); however, no report has been published on the gas transport properties of ZnO/PEBA hybrid membranes. RESULTS Molecular simulation and experimental approaches were done using PEBA 1657 mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) loaded with ZnO nanorod‐ and nanosphere shaped nanomaterials at 0.5 wt% and 1 wt% loading to investigate the gas separation pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite that, these samples were featured by a higher roughness. These outcomes are in line with other reports in which the addition of nanofillers increased the overall roughness of the polymeric matrix. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite that, these samples were featured by a higher roughness. These outcomes are in line with other reports in which the addition of nanofillers increased the overall roughness of the polymeric matrix. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These outcomes are in line with other reports in which the addition of nanofillers increased the overall roughness of the polymeric matrix. 43,44 The contact angle values reported in Figure 1D highlighted a hydrophilic behavior for all formulations, essentially due to the presence of PEG domains that counteract the hydrophobicity of both PCL and PLLA. The contact angle values decreased from 60.76 ± 5.61°for the bare nanofilm down to 49.65 ± 1.67°for the PEG-b-PCL/PLLA-1 formulation, with an inversely proportional relationship between contact angle values and roughness.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the present work, the incorporation of silica nanoparticles inside the membrane matrix produced a preferential diffusion path for the CO 2 gas molecules while functioning as a diffusion obstacle for N 2 to increase the selectivity . Moreover, even before surface coating of silica particles with LDPE, the nanoparticles had been treated previously with HMDS to replace the hydroxyl groups on the nanoparticle surface (courtesy of Cabot, USA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In the present work, the incorporation of silica nanoparticles inside the membrane matrix produced a preferential diffusion path for the CO 2 gas molecules while functioning as a diffusion obstacle for N 2 to increase the selectivity. 44,45 Moreover, even before surface coating of silica particles with LDPE, the nanoparticles had been treated previously with HMDS to replace the hydroxyl groups on the nanoparticle surface (courtesy of Cabot, USA). After replacing hydrophilic hydroxyl groups of silica by methyl groups of HMDS, 46,47 the hydrophobicity of the nanoparticles enhanced, thus leading to an increase in wetting resistance that shows stable long-term MGA performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the availability and low prices of these particles make them a suitable choice for the mixed matrix membranes preparation in the case of CO 2 /N 2 and CO 2 /CH 4 separations [19][20][21][22]. Some researchers have studied the incorporation of metal oxide particles such as TiO 2 [11,24], ZnO [25,26], SiO 2 [27,28], and γ-Al 2 O 3 [29] into PEBA membranes that improved the separation performance of this polymer. Azizi et al fabricated a mixed matrix membrane by dispersing SiO 2 , TiO 2 , and γ-Al 2 O 3 into PEBA 1074 and compared the permeability performance of these three types of mixed matrix membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%