Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Dinorhynchus dybowskyi (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Asopinae) and Phylogenetic Analysis of Pentatomomorpha Species

Zhao, Qing; Wang, Juan; Wang, Mengqing; Cai, Bo; Zhang, Hufang; Wei, Jiufeng

doi:10.1093/jisesa/iey031

Cited by 32 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our proposed relationship among the Alydidae and the coreid subfamilies Hydarinae and Pseudophloeinae has not been recovered in previous analysis with modern cladistic approaches (i.e., Li, 1996), though a recent mitochondrial DNA Bayesian analysis of Pentatomomorpha supported a clade comprising Hydarinae + Pseudophloeinae + Alydinae (i.e., Alydidae was not monophyletic) (Zhao et al, 2018). In our study, Alydidae was not monophyletic with respect to Pseudophloeinae and also, in the case of our supermatrix analyses, Hydarinae.…”

Section: Pseudophloeinae As a Monophyletic Groupcontrasting

confidence: 69%

“…To our knowledge, the sister group relationship between the coreid subfamily Pseudophloeinae and the alydid subfamily Alydinae has not been proposed in previous phylogenetic studies, except in the mitochondrial Bayesian analysis of Zhao et al (). Li () found Pseudophloeinae to be the sister to all sampled ingroup taxa (i.e., Rhopalidae + Alydidae + remaining Coreidae).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Specifically, the subfamily has been proposed as the sister group of Rhopalidae + Alydidae + the remaining Coreidae excluding Pseudophloeinae (Li, ) or Coreinae + Meropachyinae (Li, ). Only Li () offered a brief discussion on characters pertaining to the corresponding hypothesis: “More or less laciniate ovipositor and simple aedeagus illustrate their primitiveness of…Hydarinae in the superfamily…are markedly different from the remaining groups of Coreidae, especially in the structure of the genitalia.” However, phylogenetic analyses with mitochondrial DNA have supported several positions for the subfamily: (a) as the sister group to the Coreinae with weak support (Valero et al, ); (b) Alydinae + Pseudophloeinae (Zhao et al, ; Bayesian analysis with moderate to high support); or (c) Alydinae (Zhao et al, ; ML analysis, poorly supported). Our two hypotheses regarding the phylogenetic placement of Hydarinae are incongruent with these previous analyses, but demonstrate the non‐monophyly of the Coreidae.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Phylogenomic analysis suggests Coreidae and Alydidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) are not monophyletic

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Next‐generation sequencing technologies (NGS) allow systematists to amass a wealth of genomic data from non‐model species for phylogenetic resolution at various temporal scales. However, phylogenetic inference for many lineages dominated by non‐model species has not yet benefited from NGS, which can complement Sanger sequencing studies. One such lineage, whose phylogenetic relationships remain uncertain, is the diverse, agriculturally important and charismatic Coreoidea (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Given the lack of consensus on higher‐level relationships and the importance of a robust phylogeny for evolutionary hypothesis testing, we use a large data set comprised of hundreds of ultraconserved element (UCE) loci to infer the phylogeny of Coreoidea (excluding Stenocephalidae and Hyocephalidae), with emphasis on the families Coreidae and Alydidae. We generated three data sets by including alignments that contained loci sampled for at least 50%, 60%, or 70% of the total taxa, and inferred phylogeny using maximum likelihood and summary coalescent methods. Twenty‐six external morphological features used in relatively comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of coreoids were also re‐evaluated within our molecular phylogenetic framework. We recovered 439–970 loci per species (16%–36% of loci targeted) and combined this with previously generated UCE data for 12 taxa. All data sets, regardless of analytical approach, yielded topologically similar and strongly supported trees, with the exception of outgroup relationships and the position of Hydarinae. We recovered a monophyletic Coreoidea, with Rhopalidae highly supported as the sister group to Alydidae + Coreidae. Neither Alydidae nor Coreidae were monophyletic; the coreid subfamilies Hydarinae and Pseudophloeinae were recovered as more closely related to Alydidae than to other coreid subfamilies. Coreinae were paraphyletic with respect to Meropachyinae. Most morphological traits were homoplastic with several clades defined by few, if any, synapomorphies. Our results demonstrate the utility of phylogenomic approaches in generating robust hypotheses for taxa with long‐standing phylogenetic problems and highlight that novel insights may come from such approaches.

show abstract

Section: Pseudophloeinae As a Monophyletic Groupcontrasting

confidence: 69%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Phylogenomic analysis suggests Coreidae and Alydidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) are not monophyletic

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The complete mitogenome of E. aeneus is 16,065 bp in length (Genbank accession number: MK841489), and has 13 PCGs, 22 tRNAs (transfer RNA genes), 2 rRNAs (ribosomal RNA genes), and a control region. The gene arrangement and structure of the genes are similar to those of other pentatomid species (Zhao et al 2018). The overall base composition of the genome is 43.08% A, 12.84% C, 9.81% G, and 34.27% T, exhibiting an obvious A þ T bias (77.354%).…”

Section: Eysarcoris Aeneus;mentioning

confidence: 63%

Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Eysarcoris aeneus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), with its phylogenetic analysis

Zhao

Chen

Liu

et al. 2019

Mitochondrial DNA Part B

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, the complete 16,065 bp mitochondrial genome of Eysarcoris aeneus was determined from China using next-generation sequencing technology. It consists of 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNAs, 2 ribosomal RNAs, and a control region. Among them, 23 genes were located on J-strand, and the other genes (nad5, nad4, nad4L, nad1, trnQ, trnC, trnY, trnF, trnH, trnP, trnL1, trnV, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA) were located on the N-strand. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MrBayes method based on the 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) showed the present species clustered within the Pentatomidae. The complete mitogenome data would be useful for further study of Pentatomoidea and Pentatomomorpha.

show abstract

“…Coreoidea + Pyrrhocoroidea + Lygaeoidea (e.g. XIE et al 2005;LI et al 2016a;ZHAO et al 2018;WANG et al 2016WANG et al , 2019LIU et al 2018LIU et al , 2019. However, the relationships within Eutrichophora remain obscure, and three competing hypotheses have been suggested:…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scanning the Hyocephalidae: details of their external morphology with respect to phylogenetic relationships within Eutrichophora (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

Kment

Hemala

Malenovský

2019

Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Hyocephalidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha) is a small family of true bugs containing two genera and three species endemic to Australia. For the first time, we examine here selected structures of their external morphology using scanning electron microscopy – the external structures associated with the metathoracic and dorsoabdominal scent glands, the strainer organ on the sternite III, as well as the trichobothrial pattern and ultrastructure. The following character states are confirmed (i, ii, iii) or newly recognised (iv, v) as autapomorphies of Hyocephalidae: i) apically projected scimitar-shaped peritreme of the metathoracic scent glands; ii) presence of a strainer organ on sternite III in both sexes; iii) trichobothria on sternite V placed immediately ventrad of spiracle, iv) trichobothria on each of abdominal segments III–VII all grouped together within a common trichome, and v) presence of crocus-like structures within the trichome. Of particular interest is the presence of a shallow open bothrium (type B) surrounded by a trichome in Hyocephalidae, a probably derived character state shared with Pyrrhocoroidea and most Lygaeoidea, while Stenocephalidae (previously considered to be closely related to Hyocephalidae and used here for comparison) and the remaining Coreoidea possess a recessed bothrium of type A2, lacking the trichome. The morphology of trichobothria in Hyocephalidae may thus suggest either their closer relationship to Lygaeoidea + Pyrrhocoroidea than to Coreoidea, or a parallel evolution of the open bothrium with trichome in Eutrichophora. We highlight the importance of Hyocephalidae for a better understanding of the phylogeny of Eutrichophora and the urgent need to obtain phylogenomic data for future research. A taxonomic catalogue of Hyocephalidae is supplemented. The neotype designation for Hyocephalus aprugnus Bergroth, 1906 made by ŠTYS (1964) and supported by GRANT & ŠTYS (1970) is found invalid.

show abstract

Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Dinorhynchus dybowskyi (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Asopinae) and Phylogenetic Analysis of Pentatomomorpha Species

Cited by 32 publications

References 50 publications

Phylogenomic analysis suggests Coreidae and Alydidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) are not monophyletic

Phylogenomic analysis suggests Coreidae and Alydidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) are not monophyletic

Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Eysarcoris aeneus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), with its phylogenetic analysis

Scanning the Hyocephalidae: details of their external morphology with respect to phylogenetic relationships within Eutrichophora (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About