2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2016.7744087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity measures in Genetic Programming learning: A brief review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall GA used in the experiments is given as follows: Since in this work we are searching for interpretable solutions, a measure of complexity has to be established. Measuring the complexity of an individual can generally be stated with respect to its genotype (structural) or with respect to its phenotype (functional) (Le, Xuan, Brabazon, and Thi, 2016). Here, we decided to use a simple nodecounting measuring strategy where different types of functions, variables and terminals are counted with different weightings.…”
Section: Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall GA used in the experiments is given as follows: Since in this work we are searching for interpretable solutions, a measure of complexity has to be established. Measuring the complexity of an individual can generally be stated with respect to its genotype (structural) or with respect to its phenotype (functional) (Le, Xuan, Brabazon, and Thi, 2016). Here, we decided to use a simple nodecounting measuring strategy where different types of functions, variables and terminals are counted with different weightings.…”
Section: Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of empirical modeling using GP, Le et al [30] have recently reviewed the use of complexity measures, and point out the critical importance of trading off goodness-of-fit to the training data against model complexity; see also [36,Chap 7]. To explicitly address this trade-off here, we have used a global multiobjective GP formulation in this work with conventional tree-based individuals where the single population was sorted according to Pareto dominance.…”
Section: Evolutionary Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal contribution of this paper is an investigation of the performance of GP approaches when supplemented by semantically-aware local search methods. In particular, this paper extends consideration of the effectiveness of local search to a multiobjective (MO) GP framework since this explicitly trades off goodness-of-fit against model complexity, a key requirement in the empirical modeling of data [10,30]. For the reasons stated in the preceding paragraph, we also make comparison with the RDO approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic programming, which provides a novel way for efficient cache replacement policy, is an evolutionary methodology whereas an alternative to a solution; the population involves programs . The programs are typically a naive illustration of a tree, graph, or set of command (instructions).…”
Section: The Proposed Intelligent Cache Replacement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an approximate solution is acceptable, so GP is a good solution for evolving a good cache replacement strategy. Genetic programming is an evolutionary computation procedure that by design dissolves difficulties devoid of demanding the handler to recognize or identify the formula or construction of the solution beforehand . Genetic programming organizes this by arbitrarily producing a population of computer programs (demonstrated by tree context) and then mutating and crossing over the finest carrying out trees to generate a novel population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%