“…CO stripping voltammetry of commercial Pt/C catalysts, USCS Au 38:4 @Au 9:3 Pt 52:3 -NP/C catalysts and USCS D Au 61:2 @Au 27:3 Pt 11:5 -NP/C catalysts was further carried out to illustrate the formation of discrete Pt shells by comparison 4): 10 The results further indicate that the Pt atoms on the surface of the USCS D Au 61:2 @Au 27:3 Pt 11:5 NPs are not continuous and have a weak adsorption ability for CO, which is consistent with those reported in the literature: 26 However, the large potential range of the CO-stripping peak of USCS D Au 61:2 @Au 27:3 Pt 11:5 -NP/C catalysts would offset the decreasing adsorption ability for CO due to the increasing amount of adsorption sites, which is indicated by the presence of a broad adsorption potential range for CO (from À0:1 to 1:05 V): 10,27 That is, USCS D Au 61:2 @Au 27:3 Pt 11:5 -NP/C catalysts would promote the desorption of intermediate products in the catalytic process towards the FAOR due to the decreasing adsorption ability and make them convert to the direct pathway, thereby enhancing the FAOR catalytic performance: 7 3:3: Determination of the elemental composition of USCS D Au 61:2 @Au 27:3 Pt 11:5 NPs According to the method reported in our previous work, 4,[28][29][30][31] the bulk composition and surface composition of the USCS D Au-Pt NPs can also be determined by cyclic voltammetry in alkaline media: The surface composition of the as-prepared USCS D Au-Pt NPs can be calculated on the basis of the surface areas of Au and Pt obtained, which can be deduced as follows:…”