2017
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR–Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells

Abstract: The CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized gene editing both on single genes and in multiplexed loss-of-function screens, enabling precise genome-scale identification of genes essential to proliferation and survival of cancer cells1,2. However, previous studies reported that a gene-independent anti-proliferative effect of Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage confounds such measurement of genetic dependency, leading to false positive results in copy number amplified regions3,4. We developed CERES, a computational method t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
1,311
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,615 publications
(1,439 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
34
1,311
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fileset. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7655150) 46 . The CERES score for each of these genes in COV434 and BIN67 cell lines were compared to the average effect of each gene knock-out across all 625 cell lines in the database using a Z score calculated as Z=(x -μ)/σ where x is the CERES score for the gene of interest in either COV434 or BIN67, μ is the average CERES score for the gene of interest across all cell lines in the database, and σ is the standard deviation of the CERES score for the gene of interest across all cell lines in the database.…”
Section: Crispr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fileset. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7655150) 46 . The CERES score for each of these genes in COV434 and BIN67 cell lines were compared to the average effect of each gene knock-out across all 625 cell lines in the database using a Z score calculated as Z=(x -μ)/σ where x is the CERES score for the gene of interest in either COV434 or BIN67, μ is the average CERES score for the gene of interest across all cell lines in the database, and σ is the standard deviation of the CERES score for the gene of interest across all cell lines in the database.…”
Section: Crispr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine synthetic lethal dependencies of protein interactors exclusive to the residual SWI/SNF in SCCOHT cells, we analyzed how CRISPR knock-out of genes encoding SCCOHTexclusive SWI/SNF-interacting proteins affected growth of SCCOHT cell lines compared to the average effect across all cell lines in the database using publicly available data 46 . Depletion of 6 genes, highlighted in Figure 9, selectively reduced growth of both BIN67 and COV434.…”
Section: A Subset Of Proteins Interacting Exclusively With Sccoht Swimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we conducted LDH release assays upon treating U937 cells with the corresponding serial dilution of D-NA-NOXA SAHB-15 R31E and observed no non-specific membrane-lytic activity, as measured at 30 min and 4 hr (Figures S2F and S2G). We also conducted the above-described cytotoxicity studies on additional cancer cell lines that exhibit dependency on BFL-1, such as OCI-AML-3 AML and Jurkat T cell leukemia cells (Kim et al, 2005; Meyers et al, 2017), and observed pharmacologic synergy similar to that seen in U937 cells (Figures S3A–S3D). Next, we tested two additional ATM inhibitors, Ku-60019 (Golding et al, 2009) and Ku-55933 (Hickson et al, 2004), and noted the same pattern of synergy in U937 cells (Figures S3E–S3H) but not in MV4;11 cells (Figures S3I–S3L) as observed for AZD0156 (Figure 4D–4I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…BFL-1 dependency analyses were performed using the reported genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screening dataset (Meyers et al, 2017). We defined 2,027 genes as likely pan-essential genes, whose dependency scores fall in the bottom 23% of gene scores in at least 90% of the cell lines evaluated.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation