2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10579-019-09459-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational text analysis within the Humanities: How to combine working practices from the contributing fields?

Abstract: This position paper is based on a keynote presentation at the COLING 2016 Workshop on Language Technology for Digital Humanities in Osaka, Japan. It departs from observations about working practices in Humanities disciplines following a hermeneutic tradition of text interpretation versus the method-oriented research strategies in Computational Linguistics (CL). The respective praxeological traditions are quite different. Yet more and more researchers are willing to open up Keywords Digital humanities Á Adaptat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The research framework summarised in this paper originates from the synergy of two examples of mixed-method approaches to research: DNA on the Political Science/SNA side [23], and our hybrid methodology on the CL/DH side [20]. Bringing together questions, methods, and concrete requirements from different fields has shaped our research program and brought it further for all involved sides, providing valuable criteria for the interpretation of the ML results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research framework summarised in this paper originates from the synergy of two examples of mixed-method approaches to research: DNA on the Political Science/SNA side [23], and our hybrid methodology on the CL/DH side [20]. Bringing together questions, methods, and concrete requirements from different fields has shaped our research program and brought it further for all involved sides, providing valuable criteria for the interpretation of the ML results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hovy and Spruit, 2016;Bird, 2020) and the relationship between language technology and humanities (e.g. Kuhn, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2020). These discussions are guided by questions that encourage the students to draw on their disciplinary backgrounds, which exposes them to a wide range of perspectives to language technology and the humanities.…”
Section: Pedagogical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By calculating the polarity 7 of the sentences, the subtle changes of tonality in how the news media treats the conjunction of 'Asian' and 'COVID' can be revealed. Second, the method enables the digitally enhanced hermeneutics, which punctuates the subjectivity of the researcher (Kuhn, 2019). According to Gadamerian hermeneutics, prejudice is the basis of understanding the context surrounding the self (Deetz, 1978).…”
Section: A Third Person Point Of View On First Person Narratives Of Umentioning
confidence: 99%