2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0626-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer-Aided Nodule Detection on Digital Chest Radiography: Validation Test on Consecutive T1 Cases of Resectable Lung Cancer

Abstract: Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of a commercially available computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system on operable T1 cases of lung cancer by use of digital chest radiography equipment. Materials and Methods. Fifty consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary lung cancer, and 50 normal cases were selected. All cancer cases were histopathologically confirmed T1 cases. All normal individuals were selected on the basis of chest computed tomography (CT) confirmation and were matched with cancer cases in te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while the integration of CAD into a routine clinical PACS environment is gaining momentum [25][26][27][28], the interactive functionality for reviewing CAD marks within PACS is currently limited. The main purpose of the present report, therefore, has been to assess the impact on reader's identification of solid lung nodules employing a CAD server integrated into a PACS environment as a potential component of routine clinical CT interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while the integration of CAD into a routine clinical PACS environment is gaining momentum [25][26][27][28], the interactive functionality for reviewing CAD marks within PACS is currently limited. The main purpose of the present report, therefore, has been to assess the impact on reader's identification of solid lung nodules employing a CAD server integrated into a PACS environment as a potential component of routine clinical CT interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, there were many reasons that were proposed as primary causes for the SOS effect, including faulty visual search, recognition and decision-making errors. [16][17][18] There are various solutions proposed to counteract these perceptual and interpretational errors and improve radiologists' detection of abnormalities, including double reading, 19,20 computer-aided detection 21,22 and the introduction of educational strategies. 23,24 However, to identify the underlying errors in perception and interpretation of radiologists leading to missed abnormalities and to successfully aid in improving their ability to detect abnormalities, it is vital to understand the visual search behaviour of radiologists when viewing medical images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the lowest rating was already counted as a positive reading. This threshold is also used in other studies that evaluated CAD ( 22,26 ) and ensures that all changes made owing to CAD are accounted for in the evaluation, because observers had a low confi dence in most markings that were placed after seeing the CAD results.…”
Section: Thoracic Imaging: Computer-aided Detection Of Lung Cancer Onmentioning
confidence: 99%