2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer and microswitch-based programs to improve academic activities by six children with cerebral palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The devices themselves are meant to apply to specific populations, and therefore must be tested rigorously within that population. Thus, user feasibility studies and evaluations have been performed to evaluate assistive technology for multiple populations including cerebral palsy 15,16 dementia, 17 aging-in-place, 18 and spinal cord injury. 19 Motor learning for individuals with mobility impairments has been studied for rehabilitation purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The devices themselves are meant to apply to specific populations, and therefore must be tested rigorously within that population. Thus, user feasibility studies and evaluations have been performed to evaluate assistive technology for multiple populations including cerebral palsy 15,16 dementia, 17 aging-in-place, 18 and spinal cord injury. 19 Motor learning for individuals with mobility impairments has been studied for rehabilitation purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited opportunities to participate in reading instruction have been identified as a barrier for students with disabilities (Peeters et al, 2011). Stasolla et al (2015) supports AT use to improve "option opportunities" for participation, a primary outcome identified by the WHO ICF. Participation was not measured as an outcome, but was discussed, in five additional studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ATs can help carers understand and interpret the preferences of PIDD and help PD communicate those preferences [c.f. ( 24 , 25 )]. As such, they are useful, but they also risk misrepresenting an individual's subjective experiences, or constructing preferences (by framing responses to certain things or directing their attention in specific ways) that are in fact in the interests of the developer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%