2017
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201612454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computer‐Assisted 3D Structure Elucidation of Natural Products using Residual Dipolar Couplings

Abstract: An enhanced computer-assisted procedure for the determination of the relative configuration of natural products, which starts from the molecular formula and uses a combination of conventional 1D and 2D NMR spectra, and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs), is reported. Having already the data acquired (1D/2D NMR and RDCs), the procedure begins with the determination of the molecular constitution using standard computer-assisted structure elucidation (CASE) and is followed by fully automated determination of relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated and optimized scaling factors c increased as expected being now 0.119 and 0.281, respectively. Our second test molecule 10-epi-8-deoxycumambrin B (2), [40] which has already previously been the target of an RDC analysis, [8,41] has one more stereogenic center than α-santonin 1, leading therefore to 16 possible diastereomers. The different configurations of 2 will be named after descriptors R/S at positions C1, C5, C6, C7, and C10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimated and optimized scaling factors c increased as expected being now 0.119 and 0.281, respectively. Our second test molecule 10-epi-8-deoxycumambrin B (2), [40] which has already previously been the target of an RDC analysis, [8,41] has one more stereogenic center than α-santonin 1, leading therefore to 16 possible diastereomers. The different configurations of 2 will be named after descriptors R/S at positions C1, C5, C6, C7, and C10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RDCs encode for the relative orientation of internuclear vectors (e.g., CH bonds) with respect to the alignment tensor regardless of the distance between them. Hence, RDCs can be employed for determination of the relative configuration even in the presence of some degree of molecular flexibility . In an analogous way, the orientation between the principal axis system of chemical shielding tensors relative to the alignment tensor can be determined by measurement of residual chemical shift anisotropies (RCSAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the 13 C‐NMR empirical chemical shift prediction, the first scored structure, as shown in Figure , was obtained. The next step involved feeding of 2D SDF file into the previously published Python programme, which encapsulated the diastereoisomer generation and conformational search steps, followed by the development of new scripts to automatically launch the density functional theory (DFT) chemical shift computations. Because of the geometrical hindrance created by the peroxide ring, only 32 diastereoisomers from possible 64 could be obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently,t he benefits to combining computer-assisted structural elucidation( CASE)p rograms and density functional theory( DFT) calculations in exclusive concert with RDCs and/or RCSAs opens exciting perspectives for the automatic and efficient structurald iscrimination of challenging molecular structures without the need of the classical scalar J couplings or NOEs. [14][15][16] In contrastt ot he isotropic (iso) J andc hemical shifts (d iso ), anisotropic (aniso)R DCs and RCSAs constraints show as trongd ependence on the type, nature,a nd level of molecular alignment of the sample to be analysed, and therefore their accurate determination and reproducibility represent an important,challenging task.Experimentally,t he magnitude and, above all,t he signo f RDCs or RCSAs can be determined by comparing two independentm easurements in two separate isotropic versusa nisotropic samples or at two different alignment conditions. Ap rimary experimental concern is the equivalence between the iso…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%