Computer-based simulation training in emergency medicine designed in the light of malpractice cases

Abstract

BackgroundUsing computer-based simulation systems in medical education is becoming more and more common. Although the benefits of practicing with these systems in medical education have been demonstrated, advantages of using computer-based simulation in emergency medicine education are less validated. The aim of the present study was to assess the success rates of final year medical students in doing emergency medical treatment and evaluating the effectiveness of computer-based simulation training in improving final year medical students’ knowledge.MethodsTwenty four Students trained with computer-based simulation and completed at least 4 hours of simulation-based education between the dates Feb 1, 2010 - May 1, 2010. Also a control group (traditionally trained, n =24) was chosen. After the end of training, students completed an examination about 5 randomized medical simulation cases.ResultsIn 5 cases, an average of 3.9 correct medical approaches carried out by computer-based simulation trained students, an average of 2.8 correct medical approaches carried out by traditionally trained group (t = 3.90, p < 0.005). We found that the success of students trained with simulation training in cases which required complicated medical approach, was statistically higher than the ones who didn’t take simulation training (p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionsComputer-based simulation training would be significantly effective in learning of medical treatment algorithms. We thought that these programs can improve the success rate of students especially in doing adequate medical approach to complex emergency cases.

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Education Research: The Best Publications of 2014

“…Topics of study in 2014 followed the ongoing trend of employing technology, with a 48% prevalence, of which half were based on simulation; both figures are similar to 2013. Other uses of technology included ultrasound, social media, video, and audience response systems .…”

“…A total of 243 papers satisfied the search criteria, and 25 papers met the inclusion criteria . The 25 articles (22 quantitative, three qualitative studies) were critically appraised by each of six reviewers.…”

“…It is incumbent on education researchers in EM to understand the basic tenets of qualitative research and its role in laying the groundwork for future study. Experimental or quasi‐experimental research design accounted for nine (36%) of the studies, a slight increase over 2013 (33%) . Outcomes derived from research measuring quantitative variables related to learning have a varying effects.…”

“…Authors studied physicians in training and in practice, but no studies focused on patients or other groups this year. Medical student education was the central theme in five (20%) of studies, while residents were the target of study in 12 (48%) studies, and faculty were the primary group in one (4%) . Many studies targeted multiple learner groups: medical students and residents; medical students, residents, and faculty; medical students and faculty; and residents and faculty …”

Simulatiom Based Education as Tool in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review

“…Computer-based simulation training appears to increase student success rates in complex emergencies such as perforated peptic ulcer, deep venous thrombosis, or organophosphate insecticide poisoning, in which the latter had success rates of diagnosis and treatment of 62.5% in students trained with simulation against 29.2% of traditionally trained students 16 . Computer-based medical simulation is efficient to test students' level of knowledge in procedures and increase the success rate in performing the appropriate medical approach to emergencies.…”