1975
DOI: 10.1080/00337577508240811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concentration profiles of boron implantations in amorphous and polycrystalline silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 plots the skewness and kurtosis versus incident-ion energies for the implantation of boron ions into single-constituent materials such as silicon wafers. The symbols are adopted from experimental data of Hofker et al [3] and Fink et al [34]. Since Winterbon did not present data on skewness and kurtosis for boron implanted in silicon wafers in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 plots the skewness and kurtosis versus incident-ion energies for the implantation of boron ions into single-constituent materials such as silicon wafers. The symbols are adopted from experimental data of Hofker et al [3] and Fink et al [34]. Since Winterbon did not present data on skewness and kurtosis for boron implanted in silicon wafers in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projected range refers to the mean range of the implanted ion profile, and range straggling defines the standard deviation of the implanted ion profile. However, the simplicity of this characterization justifies only limited use [2,3]. More accurately corresponding the asymmetrical behavior observed in implanted ion profiles requires higher moments of the projected range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pearson IV distribution function [37] has been used by numerous investigators to represent the depth dependence of an ion implantation since first applied by Hofker et al [38]. The Pearson IV is given as…”
Section: The Pearson IV Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pearson IV fit 30 for the experimental SIMS profile based on the moments obtained from Eqs. 1 through 6 is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Implant Profile Range Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%