2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Cab Suspension System for a Self-propelled Agricultural Machine—Part 2: Operator Comfort Optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With traditional rubber mounts, the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver's seat and cab's pitch vibrations are quite great, which can make the driver tired and uncomfortable [34]; however, those of cab's roll vibration are relatively small, and these results are similarly the basis of measurements and simulations results by Kordestani et al and Quynh [12,17]. In addition, the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver's seat, cab's pitch, and roll vibrations with hydraulic mounts are, respectively, decreased by 32.48%, 26.31%, and 63.03% in comparison with traditional rubber mounts and by 13.11%, 16.24%, and 1.42% in comparison with pneumatic mounts. Thus, the driver's ride comfort can be clearly improved by using the hydraulic mounts.…”
Section: The Weighted Rms Acceleration Responsessupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With traditional rubber mounts, the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver's seat and cab's pitch vibrations are quite great, which can make the driver tired and uncomfortable [34]; however, those of cab's roll vibration are relatively small, and these results are similarly the basis of measurements and simulations results by Kordestani et al and Quynh [12,17]. In addition, the weighted RMS values of the vertical driver's seat, cab's pitch, and roll vibrations with hydraulic mounts are, respectively, decreased by 32.48%, 26.31%, and 63.03% in comparison with traditional rubber mounts and by 13.11%, 16.24%, and 1.42% in comparison with pneumatic mounts. Thus, the driver's ride comfort can be clearly improved by using the hydraulic mounts.…”
Section: The Weighted Rms Acceleration Responsessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, vibrations in the low-frequency range of 0.5-10 Hz caused by terrain roughness can lead to the main risk factors which seriously affect the driver's mental and physical health [15,16]. Consequently, cab's isolation mounts are one of the most important factors to improve the driver's ride comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the important factors for vehicle suspension design was to consider the specific vibration frequency of the suspension system to avoid the resonance of the suspension system under the excitation frequency of the road surface [6,7,10]. Some studies of the ride comfort of the vehicle in the frequency domain had shown that the ride quality of the vehicle and durability of the suspension structures were greatly affected in the frequency range below 10 Hz, especially in the low-frequency range from 0.5-4 Hz [14,15]. To reduce the impact of the resonant in the low-frequency region, the specific vibration frequency of the suspension system should be calculated and designed in a range below 2.5 Hz [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping effect of air-spring suspension is substantially better than that of mechanical spring suspension. Deprez et al [13][14][15][16] established a dynamic model of the six degrees of freedom of an agricultural machinery cab suspension system. A simulation and experiment validation were performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%