Concurrent Ownership of Brands and Counterfeits: Conceptualization and Temporal Transformation from a Consumer Perspective

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to shed light on consumers’ concurrent ownership of original and counterfeit versions of a brand, a phenomenon that is lively in the global market place but has thus far failed to attract adequate research attention. Using findings from eight focus group discussions, this paper investigates the relationships consumers have with brands and counterfeits when they own both at the same time, based on different object‐, self‐, and other‐centered engagements. Subsequently, three distinct consumer segments were identified that vary in their relationship trajectories over time. Along three established phases, a decline in purchasing of counterfeits can be observed; between Phases 1 and 2, this is due largely to negative emotional aspects, while making the transition to Phase 3 is always induced by a conflict with the social self. In all three segments the gap between the perceived and ideal social self widens, yet, once again, there are differences in the coping strategies.

United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage consumers in their fight against counterfeits

“…For this group of customers, the choice of counterfeits is clearly not income-related. While they are interested in original brands, they prefer a counterfeit version for certain reasons--such as fun, pleasure, and excitement (Yoo & Lee, 2009)--and circumstances--for example, to protect the original from wearing out during travel (Gentry, Putrevu, & Shultz, 2006;Gistri, Romani, Pace, Gabrielli, & Grappi, 2009;Stöttinger & Penz, 2015). The Internet as a distribution channel allows these consumers to gain even further access to fakes because it broadens the number of products to choose from.…”

Neither an Authentic Product nor a Counterfeit: The Growing Popularity of Shanzhai Products in Global Markets

“…Besides functional and social values, products can also satisfy individual needs such as materialism and enhancing self‐concept (Nia & Zaichkowsky, ). Prior research has found that individual characteristics such as materialism and perception of self‐image have a strong impact on counterfeit purchases (Eisend & Schuchert‐Güler, ; Kozar & Marcketti, ; Penz & Stöttinger, ; Stöttinger & Penz, ; Yoo & Lee, ). In this study, we use self‐clarity and materialism to capture the impact of individual values on the purchase intention of shanzhai products and counterfeit products.…”

Toward a Framework for Identifying Attitudes and Intentions to Music Acquisition from Legal and Illegal Channels

“…Historically music piracy research has its roots to anti-counterfeiting research and has been addressed by research highlighting the billions lost globally from the industry (Albers-Miller, 1999;Herstein, Drori, Berger, & Barnes, 2015;Stottinger & Penz, 2015). Most piracy studies that were conducted before the turn of the millennium were based on traditional software piracy of software duplication.…”