2008
DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2008.11464546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition monitoring of low speed bearings: A comparative study of the ultrasound technique versus vibration measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(15) and crest factor Eq. (16), which are among the most commonly used statistical parameters in bearing fault detection [50].…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Proposed Eemd-mspca Methods To Bearing Faulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) and crest factor Eq. (16), which are among the most commonly used statistical parameters in bearing fault detection [50].…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Proposed Eemd-mspca Methods To Bearing Faulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing internal temperature field is complex, so the more current research is how to obtain the internal temperature field and how the temperature field affects the bearing performance [105][106][107][108]. Ultrasonic detection can also be used in bearing condition monitoring [109][110]. In recent years the ultrasonic detection applied to measure the oil film thickness of rolling bearing lubrication [111][112][113], in order to obtain the state of rolling bearing [114].…”
Section: Other Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These defects are inherent in the bearing material or imposed in the form of contaminating particles from the environment. These defects reveal themselves as momentary peaks in the ultrasound signature of the bearing during low speed operation [2,3]. In either case, the frictional effect of the irregularity may be calculated as follows (Figs.…”
Section: Instantaneous Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sound produced by a ball bearing can be traced to defects and/or solid foreign objects that interfere with the rolling of a ball over a race surface [1][2][3][4]. The human ear is not capable of hearing the high frequency sounds generated by impacts between ball and race as the rolling contact between them is periodically impeded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%