2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36812-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configurable Fault-Tolerance for a Configurable VLIW Processor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed approach is applied over a VLIW processor, which has a fixed issue-width during execution, defined at design-time, running a single application. Dynamically reconfigurable and fault tolerant VLIWs, such as [15], where several applications are executed in parallel, is left as future work. Fig.…”
Section: Intra-cluster Dynamic Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed approach is applied over a VLIW processor, which has a fixed issue-width during execution, defined at design-time, running a single application. Dynamically reconfigurable and fault tolerant VLIWs, such as [15], where several applications are executed in parallel, is left as future work. Fig.…”
Section: Intra-cluster Dynamic Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the experimental results, the average ILP of ten benchmarks on a VLIW processor having 4 issues is 2. 15 (more details in Table 7 -Section 5). Therefore, the idle FUs can be used to execute the replicated instructions, reducing the negative impact of SW redundancy on the execution time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First concepts involving coarse-grained lockstepping are promising [18]- [20], but do not address the specific challenges to FT in space [21]. FT using thread-level very-long-instruction word architectures [22], [23] has also been explored, though the approach still requires pipelinelevel voters in hardware. Most implement checkpoint & rollback or restart, which makes them unsuitable for spacecraft command & control applications [24], others ignore fault-detection [25], [26], or require external, infallible fault detection entities with deep knowledge about application-intrinsics [27] but no concept of how this could be obtained.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%