2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital absence of the palmaris longus muscle: A meta-analysis comparing cadaveric and functional studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the findings of these monographs, variations in sample sizes, age of the study participants, and study methods should be regarded. The majority of studies have used clinical tests to find PL muscles that are prone to bias and usually overestimate the rate of PLA, compared to necropsy, i.e., objective and more accurate [10]. Of the study, participants' age also varies in these monographs; however, as PL develops at birth [11], we assumed that age is not a confounder of PLA prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the findings of these monographs, variations in sample sizes, age of the study participants, and study methods should be regarded. The majority of studies have used clinical tests to find PL muscles that are prone to bias and usually overestimate the rate of PLA, compared to necropsy, i.e., objective and more accurate [10]. Of the study, participants' age also varies in these monographs; however, as PL develops at birth [11], we assumed that age is not a confounder of PLA prevalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, it seems that clinical tests for the presence of PL might be affected by other, less frequent variabilities of the muscle as well as a simple human error (Fig. 3) [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its potential unreliability, Shaeffer's test is still vastly used both in clinic and in the research, even by authors who criticize it in their publications, mostly due to its simplicity [9,11,12,17,20]. In some situations, to avoid the above mentioned unreliability, authors tend to complement Shaeffer's test with other clinical tests such as Pushpakumar's, Mishra's, Thompson's or Gangata [1,9,11,12,20], however in most cases the differences between tests are marginal changes in fingers positioning or pressure applying [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Last, a clinical problem is that not all patients have a PL. Palmaris longus agenesis is seen in 10% to 15% of the population, although this can be different between ethnic groups [31]. If the PL is absent, a strip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon, as is used for the threeligament tenodesis procedure as described by Garcia-Elias et al [32] could also be utilized as interposition graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%