1968
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1968.00770010359005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Anomaly of the Facial Nerve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of the other cranial nerves are considered to be very rare. However, more and more variations are being recognized by microsurgery (18,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The incidence of intracranial neural connections between the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerve was 2.5 % (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of the other cranial nerves are considered to be very rare. However, more and more variations are being recognized by microsurgery (18,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The incidence of intracranial neural connections between the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerve was 2.5 % (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case with persistent stapedial artery described by Fowler (1961), the facial nerve was in its normal position but the chorda tympani took a downward course. Dickinson et al (1968) reported on a case in which the facial nerve coursed across the promontory but no persistent stapedial artery was present.…”
Section: Embryologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the early 1960s, it was believed that anomalies of the facial nerve do not occur until Fowler firstly reported a series of “hump anomaly” with facial nerve hump posterior and lateral to the prominence of the external semicircular canal (Fowler, 1961). The congenital malformation of facial nerve was gradually recognized, but still mainly in cases with microtia (Dickinson et al, 1968) or Treacher Collin's syndrome (Sando et al, 1968). For decades, accumulating data of aberrant facial nerve in congenital malformation of middle ear with no co-existing malformation of the outer ear were reported in a form of case report (Kieff et al, 1998; Inagaki et al, 2014) until very recently when Jahrsdoefer studied 54 patients with congenital middle ear malformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%