1967
DOI: 10.1136/jech.21.2.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital malformations in Israel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(5 reference statements)
4
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Jews were found to have much lower rates for these disorders than the general population, while in contrast the rates for parents of Irish ancestry were greatly increased. These findings are thus consistent with the low rates reported among Jews in Israel (Halevi, 1967) and the well-known high rates in Ireland (Penrose, 1957;Stevenson et al, 1966;Registrar-General, Northern Ireland, 1963-1965.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Jews were found to have much lower rates for these disorders than the general population, while in contrast the rates for parents of Irish ancestry were greatly increased. These findings are thus consistent with the low rates reported among Jews in Israel (Halevi, 1967) and the well-known high rates in Ireland (Penrose, 1957;Stevenson et al, 1966;Registrar-General, Northern Ireland, 1963-1965.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our slight but insignificant male preponderance agrees with most studies [1,14,16,19,25,29,34,37,39, 40] although a greater proportion offemales has been reported [15,17,27], We found no significant variation by month or season of birth; this agrees with the literature [1, 8, 10. 12, 15-17, 27.…”
Section: Othersupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, our data, even when the approximately 26.000 Puerto Rican births are excluded, are in agreement with studies which fail to find such an association [16,17,39] and those which found no independent effect of gravidity or parity [5, 16, …”
Section: Maternal Age and Paritysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…9,10,39-49 The outcomes were not clearly defined in 29 studies. 14, [16][17][18]21,22,26,27,39,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] Thirty-three studies did not define the exposure variables 7,8,14,15,18,22,23,34,40,41,[50][51][52][53][54][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%