2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connections between bullying victimization and satisfaction/frustration of adolescents' basic psychological needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, cyberbullying victimization, as a non-supportive and even harmful social context factor, may frustrate adolescents’ basic psychological needs. It was also consistent with a previous study that found that adolescents who were bullied offline were more likely to show lower satisfaction with basic psychological needs (Santurio et al, 2020). One possible explanation is that cyberbullying victims tend to perceive less social support (Ho et al, 2020), which is related to basic psychological needs frustration (Jin & Wang, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, cyberbullying victimization, as a non-supportive and even harmful social context factor, may frustrate adolescents’ basic psychological needs. It was also consistent with a previous study that found that adolescents who were bullied offline were more likely to show lower satisfaction with basic psychological needs (Santurio et al, 2020). One possible explanation is that cyberbullying victims tend to perceive less social support (Ho et al, 2020), which is related to basic psychological needs frustration (Jin & Wang, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Research on the connection between cyberbullying victimization and basic psychological needs is scarce. One recent study has shown that traditional bullying victimization is negatively associated with basic psychological needs satisfaction, and positively predicts their frustration (Santurio et al, 2020). Given the stronger harmful adverse of cyberbullying than traditional bullying (Carter & Wilson, 2015), cyberbullying victimization may be related to basic psychological needs frustration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the fourth hypothesis (further specific cross-contextual influences are possible), only a significant path from BPNs in home relationships to bullying behaviours at school was proven, showing that accumulated family conflicts combined with frustrated psychological needs at home may lead to aggressive behaviour at school (Kader & Roman, 2018;Menéndez Santurio et al, 2020). The fact that BPNs at home could not directly predict school victimisation denotes that in this particular case, the influence of the family fades out due to the role of BPNs at school (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While focusing on the relationships between BPNs and bullying, BPNT predicts that engaging in bullying is connected to thwarted relationships and frustrated BPNs (Legate et al, 2013). Thus, forms of aggression, bullying, stigmatisation, rejection and victimisation may constitute antecedents as well as consequences of thwarted BPNs (Menéndez Santurio et al, 2020;Ryan & Deci, 2017). That is, human psychological needs are not only experiential nutrients for growth, wellness and integrity, but they also involve dynamic and striving functions, significantly affecting behaviour (Chen et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limited number of studies have examined this connection between belonging (as an element of basic needs) and cyberbullying perpetration. Mainly, studies have focused on the need to belong in the context of offline bullying and victimization (e.g., Hein et al, 2015 ; Lam et al, 2015 ; Menéndez Santurio et al, 2020 ), satisfaction of basic needs in general and not testing belonging specifically (e.g., Varsamis et al, 2021 ), or—more extensively—in the workplace (e.g., Trépanier et al, 2013 ). Hein et al (2015) examined in their study in Estonia how controlling behavior by (physical education) teachers prevents the needs satisfaction of adolescent students’ basic needs (according to the self-determination theory [SDT] by Ryan and Deci, 2000 : autonomy, competence and relatedness) and found that the influence of selected dimensions of controlling behavior on offline bullying was mediated by need thwarting, i.e., more controlling teacher behavior increased need thwarting which in turn was related to increased levels of offline bullying behavior by the respective students.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%