Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War

Abstract

Conventional approaches to hegemony emphasize elements of coercion and exclusion, characteristics that do not adequately explain the operation of the growing number of regional projects or the style of emerging-power foreign policy. This article develops the concept of consensual hegemony, explaining how a structure can be articulated, disseminated and maintained without relying on force to recruit the participation of other actors. The central idea is the construction of a structural vision, or hegemony, that specifically includes the nominally subordinate, engaging in a process of dialogue and interaction that causes the subordinate parties to appropriate and absorb the substance and requisites of the hegemony as their own. The utility of consensual hegemony as an analytical device, especially for the study of regionalism and emerging market power foreign policy, is outlined with reference to Brazil's post-Cold War foreign policy, demonstrating both how a consensual hegemony might be pursued and where the limits to its ideas-based nature lie.

Relações interamericanas: a nova agenda sul-americana e o Brasil

“…Para outros pesquisadores, o país nem deseja arcar com os custos da integração, nem age de fato como uma potência regional disposta a usar de meios coercitivos quando seus interesses são afetados (Spektor, 2011). Finalmente, outros argumentos apontam para uma espécie de liderança branda do país na América do Sul (Burges, 2008;Pinheiro e Gaio, no prelo;Saraiva, 2010).…”

Moving Regions: Brazil’s Global Emergence and the Redefinition of Latin American Borders

“…Deprived of the structural resources of leadership (i.e., military power and economic might), Brazil has had no choice but to resort to instrumental (or ideational) ones hence the characterization of the country as a 'soft power' pro moting 'consensual hegemony' (Burges 2008). But this is only part of the story: ifit is true that the quest for regional influence has been conducted surreptitiously, Brazil has shown a more transparent ambition to find a place in the global SUll ill a sort of reverted image of the regional-global duplicity highlighted by Pinheiro (2000: Brazil's market size, export capacity, and investment weight have been instrumental as bargaining in international negotiations.…”

Cooperation for Development, Brazilian Regional Leadership and Global Protagonism

“…On the contrary, we have opted for examining only one dimension of Brazilian performance in the region, one that can be seen as an example of a kind of leadership. Now we turn to the concept of consensual hegemony, as crafted by Burges (2008) in his attempt to explain the leadership strategy of an emerging power like Brazil -a strategy, he concludes, in which Brazil has not succeeded. (Idem,p.…”