Consensus and discrepancies on quality: Mentor and student teacher statements on work placement mentoring

Manderstedt, Lena; Anderström, Helena; Sädbom, Rebecka Florin; Bäcklund, Johan

doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103762

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, it is still unclear whether new curriculum reform models should be introduced or whether vocational education is an excellent addition to the placement process ( Stephens, 2022 ). Aside from curriculum design, another factor that influences a higher education institute’s quality is the caliber of its instructors and students ( Manderstedt et al, 2022 ). Through innovation capabilities, placement is more accurately related to the quality of staff interaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is also suggested that simply presenting the results is adequate and that more investigation into the relationships and application of the approach is required to yield several outcomes in higher education ( Stephens, 2022 ). The placement of education quality also depends on the caliber of knowledge and instruction provided by the instructor and the kind of student aptitude that contributes to the achievement of education quality ( Manderstedt et al, 2022 ). Additionally, the placement of an education system with quality sustainability has many various forms that cannot be directly linked to any one set of factors or actions but can be changed periodically as a result of the ongoing learning opportunities that come with skill enhancement and development ( Harrison et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management

Gu²

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With changing trends and technology, the education system has evolved from a traditional to a modernized, qualitative, and innovatively sustained education system. Many factors contribute to process innovation and quality management benchmarks. This study has two primary goals: (1) determining the causal relationship between TQM and innovation capability, and (2) determining whether the exam, admission, and placement process have any effect on TQM and identifying whether TQM can act as a mediator between the admission, exam, and placement process and innovation capabilities. Furthermore, the study used TQM in multiple dimensions (quality management and leadership, staff interaction, institute productivity, and control and measurement of processes). As a result, the current study is the only one to look at TQM with its specific dimensions as a mediator, specifically in higher education. The survey and correlational methods were chosen to test the theoretical framework established using resource-based theory and explicitly based on structural equation modeling using Partial Least Square. A structured questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale was also distributed to 350 professors (faculty members) from Chinese universities to assess the research constructs. The findings revealed that TQM positively and significantly impacts innovation capabilities. Besides, the admission, exam, and placement process is inextricably linked to TQM’s dimensions and innovation capabilities. TQM also mediated significantly, and all hypotheses tested supported the findings. Future researchers should look into collaborative innovation capabilities and compare teachers’ innovation capabilities in higher education, according to the study.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management

Gu²

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This was followed by those who advanced mentorship as a way of improving feedback. In some studies [22,23,24], mentoring was described as an interpersonal relationship in which a mentor is an experienced person who provides professional knowledge and skills to guide his/her mentee. The suggestion is consistent with findings by some researchers [25,26] whereby collaboration between mentor and a prospective professional was recognized as being key for the mentee's development of professional knowledge and skills.…”

Section: 44%mentioning

confidence: 99%

Feedback in Orthodontics Residency Training: The Nigerian Experience

Etim

Arigbede

2023

JAMMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Feedback is an integral aspect of medical education necessary to promote better performance and improve self-regulation in learning. It is a two-way process of communication between an observer and the observed. Presently in Nigeria, there is insufficient information regarding feedback practices in dental residency training. Objective: To assess the perception of Nigerian dental residents, on the practice of feedback in their training generally; and particularly in Orthodontics. Materials and Methods: A survey was carried out among dental residents with clinical experience in orthodontics with a view to assessing their perception of feedback practices in the training. The study instrument was a 24- item structured self- administered questionnaire presented in google form. Data collected were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Results: Ninety-nine participants with a mean age of 33.5+ 8 were involved in the study, Forty-seven (47.5%) admitted to have heard of feedback concept. Out of 23 (23.2%) that received feedback in orthodontics, 15(65.2%) received it sometimes only. Forty-four participants (44.44%) had offensive feedback. Over half 14(60.9%) of participants that received feedback in orthodontics said the feedback they received met their learning needs. Verbal feedback and one-on-one feedback were preferred by 56(57%) and 51(52%) respondents respectively. Majority considered peer feedback as important and most of the respondents recommended the integration of regular period of individualized, interactive, and constructive feedback into their training. Conclusion: Generally, the practice of feedback in dental specialty training in Nigeria is unsatisfactory. Less than a quarter of participants received feedback in orthodontics and verbal and one-on-one feedback protocols were preferred.

show abstract

The Importance of Mentoring for the Profession of an Engineer

Modrea

Ban

2022

The 16th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consensus and discrepancies on quality: Mentor and student teacher statements on work placement mentoring

Cited by 6 publications

References 38 publications

Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management

Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management

Feedback in Orthodontics Residency Training: The Nigerian Experience

The Importance of Mentoring for the Profession of an Engineer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About