1977
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/22/4/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations of the application of indicator dilution methods to the measurement of the flow rates of fluids

Abstract: In circumstances when the flow velocity of a fluid non-homogeneous, difficulties arise in the application of the familiar indicator dilution equations. These and other relevant relationships have therefore been derived from first principles in order to clarify the conditions in which they may be expected to apply. It is shown that the method of introduction of the tracer into a fluid stream as well as its method of measurement are important factors, and the implications of these results for biological measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Introducing now the mean cross-sectional concentration into the equation (34) by substitution of equation (6), leads to where V = AL is the volume of fluid in the tube between the points of injection and observation. A similar expression for determination of fluid volume has been derived by Cottrall (1977) in the case of power-law fluid, and has been presented by Felder and Gardner (1972) in the case of general laminar fluid flow and impulse-type injection of indicator. The relation in equation (35) has now been generalised in this paper as X-1 = T-l, which relation applies to cases of general laminar fluid flow, and with arbitrary functions of the initial distribution m i ( x ) of indicator and of the line resolution s ( x ) of the detector.…”
Section: Moreover This Total Sum Of Areas Is Equal To the Area Undermentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Introducing now the mean cross-sectional concentration into the equation (34) by substitution of equation (6), leads to where V = AL is the volume of fluid in the tube between the points of injection and observation. A similar expression for determination of fluid volume has been derived by Cottrall (1977) in the case of power-law fluid, and has been presented by Felder and Gardner (1972) in the case of general laminar fluid flow and impulse-type injection of indicator. The relation in equation (35) has now been generalised in this paper as X-1 = T-l, which relation applies to cases of general laminar fluid flow, and with arbitrary functions of the initial distribution m i ( x ) of indicator and of the line resolution s ( x ) of the detector.…”
Section: Moreover This Total Sum Of Areas Is Equal To the Area Undermentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Note that the output of a density-type detector depends on the mass of indicator, while the output of a flow-rate-type detector depends on the momentum of indicator in the system. On the basis of this difference, density-type and flow-rate-type detection have been characterised as static or dynamic methods respectively (Cottrall 1977). Under conditions of good cross-sectional mixing at the detection site, the mean cross-sectional concentration 2 at that site is equal to the mean flow concentration C: It then follows from equations ( 6 ) and ( 7 ) that f ( x , t ) = ( F / A ) m ( x , t ) .…”
Section: Mass Line Density and Mass Flow Rate Of Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Some other authors have also discussed problematic aspects, mostly by use of flow pipe models. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The IDT has also been formulated by use of concepts borrowed from the theory of linear Í‘stableÍ’ systems. 2,3,7,15 The use of such a formulation does not, however, demonstrate the validity of the IDT, especially not for all kinds of detectors and labeling processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection of the flow bolus along the direction of flow can be expressed as the ratio of the area encompassing the tagged spins to the total tube cross-sectional area at a location z. If the slice thickness is given by zO and the leading edge of the bolus is at z = 0 at time t = 0, the projection at t = TE can be written as ( 17)…”
Section: Fig 4 Plot Of Measured Peak Flow Velocity As a Function Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%