1990
DOI: 10.1117/12.55622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained sinogram restoration for limited-angle tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the 2D Fourier transform via FFT is computationally more efficient than other transforms (e.g., the Chebyshev-Fourier transform [16] or Lagrange-Fourier transform [11]). This allows us to develop more efficient sinogram recovery schemes, as demonstrated in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the 2D Fourier transform via FFT is computationally more efficient than other transforms (e.g., the Chebyshev-Fourier transform [16] or Lagrange-Fourier transform [11]). This allows us to develop more efficient sinogram recovery schemes, as demonstrated in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HL consistency conditions play an important role in image reconstruction from imperfect projection data (e.g., due to noise, motion, and truncation) since these projections no longer satisfy the HL conditions. Related work uses HL conditions to estimate motion parameters directly from sinograms [8–10] or to solve the problem of limited angle tomography using a variational formulation that incorporates HL conditions [11]. In PET/SPECT, the HL consistency conditions were also used for attenuation correction if no transmission data is available [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To reduce CT truncation artifacts, a variety of data extrapolation methods have been developed to enable smoother transitions of the projection data across the boundary of the SFOV. The data extrapolation process is usually guided by certain a priori knowledge about the image object and the CT system, including the zeroth‐order Helgason–Ludwig (HL) condition, the mass conservation of projection data, higher order HL condition, sinogram decomposition method, and leveraging truncation‐free projection data from prior CT exams . The key to these extrapolation methods is to replace the missing projection data, so that the projection data can fall smoothly to zero, and the assumption of compact support for the image object can be satisfied …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also relevant for extending the measurement principle to two-plane [3] and multi-plane (threedimensional CT) [4] approaches, in which the axial offset between the detector arc and the X-ray source path is no longer acceptable due to the extended target geometry. Different approaches [5,6] have shown that it is difficult, if not impossible, to create a reconstruction algorithm that is generally applicable to those limited-angle problems in the method of suppressing the artefacts appearing when standard reconstruction methods are applied. Only a reduction of the artefacts by optimizing the geometry is feasible [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%