2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00801-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint Solving on Hybrid Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24] we described PHACT architecture, its load balancing techniques and compared its performance against Gecode (and PaCCS [21]) on solving some CSPs. Those CSPs were loaded to Gecode through FlatZinc models, but at the time, PHACT Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [24] we described PHACT architecture, its load balancing techniques and compared its performance against Gecode (and PaCCS [21]) on solving some CSPs. Those CSPs were loaded to Gecode through FlatZinc models, but at the time, PHACT Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in section III and described in [24], PHACT is also capable of using GPUs, MICs and any other device compatible with OpenCL in order to speed the solving process up. The chart in Figure 4 shows the speedups achieved when using only an Intel I7-4870HQ CPU (4 cores, 8 threads), or this CPU and one Nvidia Geforce 980M GTX GPU (12 SMs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation