Radiology reports describe the results of radiography procedures and have the potential of being a useful source of information which can bring benefits to health care systems around the world. One way to automatically extract information from the reports is by using Text Mining tools. The problem is that these tools are mostly developed for English and reports are usually written in the native language of the radiologist, which is not necessarily English. This creates an obstacle to the sharing of Radiology information between different communities. This work explores the solution of translating the reports to English before applying the Text Mining tools, probing the question of what translation approach should be used. We created MRRAD (Multilingual Radiology Research Articles Dataset), a parallel corpus of Portuguese research articles related to Radiology and a number of alternative translations (human, automatic and semi-automatic) to English. This is a novel corpus which can be used to move forward the research on this topic. Using MRRAD we studied which kind of automatic or semi-automatic translation approach is more effective on the Named-entity recognition task of finding RadLex terms in the English version of the articles. Considering the terms extracted from human translations as our gold standard, we calculated how similar to this standard were the terms extracted using other translations. We found that a completely automatic translation approach using Google leads to F-scores (between 0.861 and 0.868, depending on the extraction approach) similar to the ones obtained through a more expensive semi-automatic translation approach using Unbabel (between 0.862 and 0.870). To better understand the results we also performed a qualitative analysis of the type of errors found in the automatic and semi-automatic translations. Database URL: https://github.com/lasigeBioTM/MRRAD
Abstract-Recent developments in computer architecture progress towards systems with large core count, which expose more parallelism to applications, creating a hierarchical setup at the node and cluster levels. To take advantage of all this parallelism, applications must carefully exploit the different levels of the system which, if ignored, may yield surprising results. This aggravates the already difficult task of parallel programming.Declarative approaches such as those based on constraints are attractive to parallel programming because they concentrate on the logic of the problem. They have been successfully applied to hard problems, which usually involve searching through large problem spaces, a computationally intensive task but with potential for parallelization. Tree search algorithms play an important role in research areas such as constraint satisfaction or optimisation, and artificial intelligence. Tree search lends itself naturally to parallelization by exploiting different branches of the tree but scalability may be harder to achieve due to the high dynamic load balancing requirements.In this paper we present a high-level declarative approach based on constraints and show how it benefits from an efficient dynamic load balancing based on work stealing targeted at largescale. We focus on the implementation of a hierarchical work stealing scheme using a different programming model, GPI. Experimentation brought encouraging results on up to 512 cores on large instances of satisfaction and optimisation problems.
Recently, we developed the Parallel Heterogeneous Architecture Constraint Toolkit (PHACT), which is a multithreaded constraint solver capable of using all the available devices which are compatible with OpenCL, in order to speed up the constraint satisfaction process. In this article, we introduce an evolution of PHACT which includes the ability to execute FlatZinc and MiniZinc models, as well as architectural improvements which boost the performance in solving CSPs, especially when using GPUs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.