2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0715-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints of root response to waterlogging in Alisma triviale

Abstract: To understand the economics of root aerenchyma formation in wetland plants, we investigated in detail the response of Alisma triviale to waterlogging. We hypothesized costs being associated with development of a large root air space. In three out-door pot experiments, seedlings (1 experiment) and mature plants (2 experiments) were grown under waterlogged and drained conditions for up to 2 months. Waterlogging promoted growth, and was associated with increased root porosity and decreased root density (fresh mas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…*-letters denote statistical significance of differences between treatment combinations (NS = no significant difference; C = significant difference between CO 2 level treatments; W = significant difference between waterlogging treatments) control or recovering plants, indicates that E. camaldulensis responded favorably to waterlogging in this study. This growth response concurs with the results of previous studies (Marcar, 1993;Sena-Gomes & Kozlowski, 1980, although see Kogawara, Yamanoshita, Norisada, Masumori, & Kojima, 2006 waterlogging has been linked to the requirement for structural support of air spaces in aerenchymous root tissue (Ryser, Gill, & Byrne, 2011). Suberization of root hypodermal tissue often occurs under waterlogging as a means of reducing radial oxygen loss (De Simone et al, 2002;Visser, Colmer, Blom, & Voesenek, 2000) and may also increase root dry matter content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…*-letters denote statistical significance of differences between treatment combinations (NS = no significant difference; C = significant difference between CO 2 level treatments; W = significant difference between waterlogging treatments) control or recovering plants, indicates that E. camaldulensis responded favorably to waterlogging in this study. This growth response concurs with the results of previous studies (Marcar, 1993;Sena-Gomes & Kozlowski, 1980, although see Kogawara, Yamanoshita, Norisada, Masumori, & Kojima, 2006 waterlogging has been linked to the requirement for structural support of air spaces in aerenchymous root tissue (Ryser, Gill, & Byrne, 2011). Suberization of root hypodermal tissue often occurs under waterlogging as a means of reducing radial oxygen loss (De Simone et al, 2002;Visser, Colmer, Blom, & Voesenek, 2000) and may also increase root dry matter content.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A corresponding pattern in water use efficiency corroborates this inference. Higher root dry matter content under waterlogging has been linked to the requirement for structural support of air spaces in aerenchymous root tissue (Ryser, Gill, & Byrne, ). Suberization of root hypodermal tissue often occurs under waterlogging as a means of reducing radial oxygen loss (De Simone et al, ; Visser, Colmer, Blom, & Voesenek, ) and may also increase root dry matter content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since aerenchyma is absent in many plant species and underdeveloped in most conditions, it is likely that there may be costs associated with aerenchyma or its formation. To date, there is a lack of quantitative information on such possible disadvantages (Ryser et al, 2011;Huber and Linder, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field, however, the quick loss of water from excised leaves poses a problem, requiring protective measures against water loss. Tin cans (Stocker 1929;Jolly et al 2014), plastic vials (Hadley and Smith 1983;Armas et al 2010;Aref et al 2013;Fernández-García et al 2014), and sealed plastic bags (Smart and Bingham 1974;Gonzalez and Gonzalez-Vilar 2001;Davidson et al 2006;Gonçalves et al 2011;Ryser et al 2011;Walter et al 2011;Teszlák et al 2013) have been used to protect the collected leaves against water loss during the transportation from field to laboratory. Govender et al (2009) stress the importance of a proper sampling procedure to prevent water loss by keeping leaves in plastic bags and in a cool dark place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%