Constructivism‐informed variation theory lesson designs in enriching and elevating science learning: Case studies of seamless learning design

Abstract

The constructivist paradigm opens abundant opportunities for effective knowledge construction in which student build knowledge and continually evaluated and improved their knowledge. The teaching mode under constructivist pedagogy redefines the role of students and the teachers and their interrelationships by creating a nurturing environment. By adapting constructivist framework, this article demonstrates how the variation of learning practices was critical in facilitating Primary 4 students in Singapore to carry out seamless science learning. The variation of learning practices enables the students to explore a particular scientific concept through various learning experience across the contexts. The study adapted the framework of the Objects of Constructivist Learning Model for the improvement of the seamless science learning design. When redesigning the lesson, a conscious effort was made by the teacher to create relevant patterns of variation, that is, varying certain critical aspect(s) while keeping other aspects of the object of learning invariant in order to help students discern those critical aspects. The findings contribute knowledge to how the Theory of Variation can be used in analyzing seamless learning as well as designing for constructivist learning experiences. The findings have also demonstrated that the complementary practice of constructivist pedagogy with variation theory as a viable and effective approach in seamless science learning, at which it deepened students' understanding through constructing the critical aspects of a phenomenon. Engagement with primary school students in experiencing the variations allowed the translation of theory into practice.

Islamic Religious Education Learning Strategies to Build Inclusive Religious Character for University Students

“…The learning strategy lecturers use to build inclusive religious character among students is in line with the constructivist learning model proposed by Piaget and the social constructivist learning model by Vygotsky. Piaget's constructivist learning model emphasizes that students must be trained to construct knowledge by transforming and reorganizing prior knowledge and information (Efgivia et al, 2021;Voon et al, 2020). On the other hand, lecturers or teachers can provide full support for students to explore and develop their understanding of this learning model.…”

Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking through experiential learning: hybridisation of plugged and unplugged approaches

“…The aim of the hybridisation of plugged and unplugged CT approaches is to enable teachers to grasp CT skills and transform what they have learnt into their teaching practices (pedagogical content knowledge). This may impact their future students' CT learning indirectly as the teacher plays a crucial role in deciding the focal points of the learning (Voon et al, 2020). When teachers complete multiple cycle iterations, their learning experience will increase in complexity.…”

Triple-jeopardy! COVID-19, high ACE scores, and the US–Mexico border: Mitigating risks with trauma-informed pedagogy

“…Didactic training alone may not consistently lead to implementing strategies in the classroom. The application of constructive pedagogy comprises various learning experiences, creating patterns of variation, thus promoting seamless learning ( Voon et al, 2020 ). Active learning techniques such as the use of mentors, case studies, and role-playing can translate didactic material into behavioral changes implemented in a trauma sensitive classroom.…”