2006
DOI: 10.1109/tcapt.2006.875891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact resistance of thin metal film contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These formulas are valid only when the contacting bodies can be considered as semi-infinite compared to the area of contact. Norberg et al [18] have used numerical method to approximate the contact resistance of a thin film constituting at least one of the contacting bodies. However, we used a partially idealized model which excludes the surface roughness and the results show some uncertainties due to numerical errors.…”
Section: A Contact Resistance Versus Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These formulas are valid only when the contacting bodies can be considered as semi-infinite compared to the area of contact. Norberg et al [18] have used numerical method to approximate the contact resistance of a thin film constituting at least one of the contacting bodies. However, we used a partially idealized model which excludes the surface roughness and the results show some uncertainties due to numerical errors.…”
Section: A Contact Resistance Versus Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that Z aw /Z vw and Z as , Z gs /Z vs represent the impedances between the dashed surfaces [ Fig. 1(b)], which do not include the constriction resistances in the near field of the contacts [8]. In this paper, this error is corrected by adding Z a , Z g1−3 , and Z v to characterize the current constriction effects for the aggressor, guard ring, and victim, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Guard Ring Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(b)]. The P-well layer introduces significant current constriction effects at near fields close to the contacts [8]. Such effects cannot be effectively characterized by existing guard ring models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason finite element (FE) modeling has become an efficient approach to determine geometrical correction factors for arbitrary measurement configurations. [20][21][22][23] We have adapted this approach to determine the GCFs for the measurement geometry depicted in Figure 1(c) for a range of experimentally relevant sample dimensions and probe spacings. From the result, a simple analytical fit function is derived that allows for the calculation of GCFs(D, s, t) for an arbitrary configuration in a typical geometry range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%