1978
DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contacts and influence

Abstract: This essay raises more questions than it answers. In first draft, which we have only moderately revised, it was written about two decades ago and has been circulating in manuscript since then. (References to recent literature have, however, been added.! It was not published previously because we raised so many questions that we did not know how to answer; we hoped to eventually solve the problems and publish. The time has come to cut bait. With the publication of a new journal of human network studies, we offe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 439 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
113
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Social networks have been documented in the sociological literature, but are generally inappropriate for epidemiological purposes. Definitions of contacts that do not correlate closely with transmission opportunities, such as relationship-based definitions, inclusion of remote (letter, telephone or e-mail) interactions or the measurement of a particular subset of social contacts, render many such studies unsuitable from the epidemiological perspective (de Sola Pool & Kochen 1978;Bernard et al 1990;Wasserman & Faust 1994;Dunbar & Spoors 1995;Beutels et al 2006). As a consequence, there is relatively little available information about the patterns of human social interactions relevant to the transmission of many infectious diseases (Edmunds et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social networks have been documented in the sociological literature, but are generally inappropriate for epidemiological purposes. Definitions of contacts that do not correlate closely with transmission opportunities, such as relationship-based definitions, inclusion of remote (letter, telephone or e-mail) interactions or the measurement of a particular subset of social contacts, render many such studies unsuitable from the epidemiological perspective (de Sola Pool & Kochen 1978;Bernard et al 1990;Wasserman & Faust 1994;Dunbar & Spoors 1995;Beutels et al 2006). As a consequence, there is relatively little available information about the patterns of human social interactions relevant to the transmission of many infectious diseases (Edmunds et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that S3G2 can generate extremely large graphs quickly on a Hadoop cluster with large resources. There is a lot of work studying the characteristics of social networks [11,7,12,15,5,1,9] and also on the generation of random graphs having global properties similar to a social network [14,3,4,10,6,8]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no generator that creates a synthetic social graph with correlations.…”
Section: Case Study: Generating Social Network Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a fact that we exploit in our application to determine changes in dynamic (peer-to-peer) networks. The reader might note the resemblance with the classical Laplace (or more precisely Laplace-Beltrami) flow that has become, by now, standard in Imaging and Graphics (see, e.g., [37,42] and the references therein), defined as…”
Section: Ricci-flow With Forman Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation behind this choice of weights lies in the "small world"-property (i.e., a maximum degree of separation of six [37]) that has been reportedly found in real-world. In accounting for this, we only check for indirect connections up to a path length of six and scale the weights according to the distribution.…”
Section: Characterizing Large Data Sets With Ricci Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%