2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contagion in a network of heterogeneous banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, this information is essential to understand the dynamics of the reciprocal relationships between nodes and, consequently, the dynamics of potential spillover mechanisms. Some authors tried to overcome this problem by employing only publicly available information about the characteristics of every single subject (node), such as information coming from financial statements; based on these data, they tried to infer the structure of the network (Glasserman and Young 2015) and the reaction dynamics after different kinds of shocks, hence highlighting the progression of the contagion (Gençcay et al 2020). In this work, we employ a similar approach based on the information about every node to study the dynamics of systemic risk and contagion in a network represented by the reciprocal relationships between a single bank's customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, this information is essential to understand the dynamics of the reciprocal relationships between nodes and, consequently, the dynamics of potential spillover mechanisms. Some authors tried to overcome this problem by employing only publicly available information about the characteristics of every single subject (node), such as information coming from financial statements; based on these data, they tried to infer the structure of the network (Glasserman and Young 2015) and the reaction dynamics after different kinds of shocks, hence highlighting the progression of the contagion (Gençcay et al 2020). In this work, we employ a similar approach based on the information about every node to study the dynamics of systemic risk and contagion in a network represented by the reciprocal relationships between a single bank's customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the banking network, as the degree of interbank credit association ε(0 < ε < 1) increases, the probability of credit risk transmission within the banking system and the speed credit risk transmission rate increase. If the bank has a comprehensive risk warning mechanism and adequate capital reserves, then the bank's own risk resistance ω(0 < ω < 1) is strong and is less likely to be affected by credit risk contagion [2,13,56,57]. Second, if the bank's ability to process default information ρ(0 < ρ < 1) is strong, then the ability of the bank to the credit risk screening and risk warning ability is also strong, and the probability of the bank to inhibit the spread of credit risk is great.…”
Section: Credit Risk Contagion Probability Of Bank Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Fisher, Eboli represented a financial system as a flow network and model the process of direct balancesheet contagion as a flow of losses crossing such a network and focused most of the analysis on the effects that the connectivity and centralization of a financial network have on its exposure to default contagion and then found that both the complete and the star networks show a robust yet fragile response to shocks [10]. Gencay et al discussed that network uncertainty gives rise to an endogenous core-periphery structure which is optimal in mitigating financial contagion yet concentrates systemic risk at the core of big banks [11]. Dastkhan and Gharneh introduced a simulation model to analyze the contagion in financial markets based on the cross shareholding network of firms and the probability and the extent of contagion [12].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. In the stable state, dS k (t)/dt � 0 and dI k (t)/dt � 0, and the solution of equations (6) and (11) in the stable state is obtained as…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation