2002
DOI: 10.1179/sic.2002.47.supplement-1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary theory of conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
35

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
105
0
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Junto al paradigma establecido de la "conservación científica", cuyo principal objetivo es conservar la integridad material de la obra como objeto físico (cf. Clavir, 1998;Villers, 2004;Muñoz Viñas, 2005), distingo otros dos modelos (a menudo aunados en los discursos teóricos): el "paradigma de la performance", que considera que el núcleo del trabajo es su concepto, y que este debe ser llevado a cabo mediante la representación fidedigna de un conjunto de instrucciones que estipulen los rasgos que definen la identidad de la obra; y el "paradigma procesual", en el que no es la correspondencia entre un eventual resultado y un concepto preexistente, sino el proceso lo que se entiende como núcleo del trabajo, y el objetivo principal de la conservación consiste aquí en favorecer la continuidad de la obra mediante la transmisión de la información, destrezas y procedimientos necesarios a los participantes o depositarios designados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Junto al paradigma establecido de la "conservación científica", cuyo principal objetivo es conservar la integridad material de la obra como objeto físico (cf. Clavir, 1998;Villers, 2004;Muñoz Viñas, 2005), distingo otros dos modelos (a menudo aunados en los discursos teóricos): el "paradigma de la performance", que considera que el núcleo del trabajo es su concepto, y que este debe ser llevado a cabo mediante la representación fidedigna de un conjunto de instrucciones que estipulen los rasgos que definen la identidad de la obra; y el "paradigma procesual", en el que no es la correspondencia entre un eventual resultado y un concepto preexistente, sino el proceso lo que se entiende como núcleo del trabajo, y el objetivo principal de la conservación consiste aquí en favorecer la continuidad de la obra mediante la transmisión de la información, destrezas y procedimientos necesarios a los participantes o depositarios designados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…2 This section leans on the historical research done by authors such as Lowenthal (1981Lowenthal ( , 1985, Caple (2000), Conti (2007) and Muñoz Viñas (2005). Drawing from their writings, special attention will be paid to the impact of science on the development of conservation as a distinct profession, conservation debates and controversies, and relationships between the theory and practice of conservation.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Conservation As a Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter explores the origins and history of these 'certainties', by analysing those concepts, which belong to what Laurenson (2001a and calls 'traditional conservation', or, in the words of Muñoz Viñas (2005) 'classical conservation'. The chapter attempts to provide more insight into the use and definitions of 'artist's intention' and 'authenticity', which form the backbone of traditional conservation theory and practice.…”
Section: Outline Of the Bookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viñas (2005) argues that moral authority is not interchangeable with technical knowledge and that technical expertise is what allows for methodical decisions to be made in an educated way that a 'layperson' is not authorised to decide. Whilst the delineation between appraisal and treatment may be theoretically clear, consultation is not such a clear-cut process.…”
Section: The Issue Of Technical Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viñas (2005, p. 177) implies that people involved in 'practical functions' such as tourist connections, economy or politics may not be stakeholders but he argues that their role is nonetheless important to consider in addition to stakeholders. Remembering that value can come from these more 'mundane' aspects of an object (Viñas, 2005) is essential in maintaining a current and dynamic sense of the value of objects being treated. As Vestheim et al note, 'no value is absolute.…”
Section: Stakeholders Must Have Relationship Of Valuementioning
confidence: 99%