2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-Consistent Matching for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation

Abstract: This paper considers the adaptation of semantic segmentation from the synthetic source domain to the real target domain. Different from most previous explorations that often aim at developing adversarialbased domain alignment solutions, we tackle this challenging task from a new perspective, i.e., content-consistent matching (CCM). The target of CCM is to acquire those synthetic images that share similar distribution with the real ones in the target domain, so that the domain gap can be naturally alleviated by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…artificial light sources casting very different illumination patterns at night). A major class of adaptation approaches, including [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], involves adversarial confusion or feature alignment between domains. The general concept of curriculum learning has been successfully applied to domain adaptation by ordering tasks [51], target-domain pixels [52], or domains [10], [11], [35], [53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…artificial light sources casting very different illumination patterns at night). A major class of adaptation approaches, including [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], involves adversarial confusion or feature alignment between domains. The general concept of curriculum learning has been successfully applied to domain adaptation by ordering tasks [51], target-domain pixels [52], or domains [10], [11], [35], [53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zou et al [52] proposed a class-balanced selection strategy and selected the high-confidence pseudo-labeled target samples, while Zheng et al [51] estimated the uncertainty via an auxiliary classifier and selected the rectified pseudo labels through the dynamic threshold. Unlike the aforementioned methods, Li et al [17] proposed to select the source images that share similar distribution with the real ones in the target domain to alleviate the domain gap in another perspective.…”
Section: Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of unsupervised domain adaptive segmentation is to train a segmentation network that achieves good performance in an unlabeled target domain when only the source domain data are annotated. Methodology-wise, existing methods build on three techniques: 1) adversarial learning [7,22,32,33,36,42,44,46], 2) image-toimage translation [2,10,12,14,17,25,31,40] and 3) self-training [1,15,18,19,24,36,43,47,49,53].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%