2016
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2016.2605123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content Delivery in Erasure Broadcast Channels With Cache and Feedback

Abstract: We study a content delivery problem in a K-user erasure broadcast channel such that a content providing server wishes to deliver requested files to users, each equipped with a cache of a finite memory. Assuming that the transmitter has state feedback and user caches can be filled during off-peak hours reliably by the decentralized content placement, we characterize the achievable rate region as a function of the memory sizes and the erasure probabilities. The proposed delivery scheme, based on the broadcasting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Impact of encoding over users that share the same cache: As we know, both the MN algorithm in [1] and the multi-antenna algorithm in [38], are designed for users with different caches, so -in the uniform case where L λ = K/Λ -one conceivable treatment of the sharedcache problem would have been to apply these algorithms over Λ users at a time, all with different caches 10 . As we see, in the single antenna case, this implementation would treat 1 + Λγ users at a time thus yielding a delay of T = K(1−γ) 1+Λγ , while in the multi-antenna case, this implementation would treat N 0 + Λγ users at a time (see [38]) thus yielding a delay of T = K(1−γ) N0+Λγ .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Impact of encoding over users that share the same cache: As we know, both the MN algorithm in [1] and the multi-antenna algorithm in [38], are designed for users with different caches, so -in the uniform case where L λ = K/Λ -one conceivable treatment of the sharedcache problem would have been to apply these algorithms over Λ users at a time, all with different caches 10 . As we see, in the single antenna case, this implementation would treat 1 + Λγ users at a time thus yielding a delay of T = K(1−γ) 1+Λγ , while in the multi-antenna case, this implementation would treat N 0 + Λγ users at a time (see [38]) thus yielding a delay of T = K(1−γ) N0+Λγ .…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 3, we compare the delivery load R * A,D (m) obtained from optimization problem (18), with the lower bounds on R * (m) in (21), (22), and the lower bound with uncoded placement in (19), for N = K = 5 and m k = 0.95 m k+1 . From Fig.…”
Section: Delivery Phase: We Have the Following Transmissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19] and [20], content delivery over an erasure broadcast channel is considered, while a Gaussian broadcast channel is studied in [21], [22] and [23]. Erasure and Gaussian broadcast delivery channels with feedback are studied in [24] and [25], respectively. Main challenge in these works is to exploit the broadcast channel in a non-trivial manner, that goes beyond reducing the problem to delivery over a shared link whose rate is dictated by the user with the worst channel quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%