1990 IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. Digest of Technical Papers
DOI: 10.1109/iccad.1990.129886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contest: a fast ATPG tool for very large combinational circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some do not use the ISCAS benchmark networks [50,15,53,69] or do not publish the total CPU times needed for comparison [70,22,71]. Others either make no experimental comparison [16,17,61,65,31,35,52,29,13,54,39], or compare against other heuristics of their own implementation [51,71,42,43,25,33,14,57,28]. These approaches vary too many factors to give good experimental results.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some do not use the ISCAS benchmark networks [50,15,53,69] or do not publish the total CPU times needed for comparison [70,22,71]. Others either make no experimental comparison [16,17,61,65,31,35,52,29,13,54,39], or compare against other heuristics of their own implementation [51,71,42,43,25,33,14,57,28]. These approaches vary too many factors to give good experimental results.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 9-V [14] and 16-V [15] algebra for more precise implication process and search space reduction; • X-path check [3] for early detection of inconsistency during propagation; • unique sensitization [4] and structural dominators [5]- [7] as efficient dynamic learning techniques during propagation; • static learning [6] as an efficient technique for deriving new dependencies between signals during preprocessing; • recursive learning [16] as an efficient dynamic learning technique during propagation and justification; • single-cone processing [17] and single path-oriented propagation [8], [12] as efficient approaches for search space reduction; • backward justification [8], [18] as an alternative of forward justification making decisions only on the primary inputs [3], headlines [4], and implication nodes [19]; • Boolean satisfiability method as an elegant model of the TPG problem [1] allowing some powerful learning techniques to be used during the branch and bound search. The processes that determine the efficiency of TPG algorithms are implication, propagation, justification, fault scheduling and merging [20]- [22], and fault simulation [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a further experiment, we compare the CPU-time for test generation of our approach to those of Socrates [9], Nemesis [10], TRAN [16], CONTEST [14] and the approach of Kundu et al [22]. Table 7 Table 7 show the geometric mean of the CPU-times, an approximation of the machine speed (SPECint89), the geometric mean of CPU-times weighted with the corresponding machine speed, and the speed of the test generation normalized to the approach proposed in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schulz et al [9] further extended Fujiwara's method by introducing an improved implication and unique sensitization procedure. Further improvements were suggested, e.g., [11,14,15], however, a directed propagation has not been achieved. Larrabee [10] and Chakradar et al [16] proposed to duplicate the part of the circuit that is in the transitive fanout of the fault location.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation