2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2011.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-aware mesh smoothing for biomedical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visually obvious artifacts occurring during the imaging process were manually corrected in all cases (BLENDER 2.68A, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). To achieve a high surface quality, the segmentation results were transformed into discrete triangular meshes (approximately 0.1 mm resolution) and smoothed afterward using a Taubin smoothing algorithm [29,30]. A neuroradiologist reviewed the modified geometries afterward to check the plausibility of the reconstructed shapes.…”
Section: Vascular Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visually obvious artifacts occurring during the imaging process were manually corrected in all cases (BLENDER 2.68A, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). To achieve a high surface quality, the segmentation results were transformed into discrete triangular meshes (approximately 0.1 mm resolution) and smoothed afterward using a Taubin smoothing algorithm [29,30]. A neuroradiologist reviewed the modified geometries afterward to check the plausibility of the reconstructed shapes.…”
Section: Vascular Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, visually obvious artifacts that occurred during the imaging process were corrected manually (Blender 2.68a, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), especially in areas where the vessel and the aneurysm were melted. Finally, Taubin-smoothing on the discrete surface mesh ensured a more realistic representation (Mönch et al, 2011;Neugebauer et al, 2013). In order to check the plausibility of the reconstructed shape, the treating neuroradiologist reviewed the virtual geometry.…”
Section: Vascular Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, using more effective segmentation techniques, or enforcing denoising operation [2] before segmentation (which raises the risk of features removal and the change of relevant properties of the anatomical structures) can also reduce noise. However, this additional effort is usually not recommended, since data with higher resolution increases the computational time and the storage stress in clinical routine [3]. These artifacts can also be processed at the mesh generation stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, some researchers attempted to solve the artifacts on medical surface by carefully selecting existing filters (e.g., in [17] [18]) or by adapting some of them (e.g., in [19] [3]). However, these efforts are still based on the traditional smoothing framework, which cannot completely avoid the aforementioned disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%