2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting growth and mortality responses to climate warming of two pine species in a continental Mediterranean ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we conducted the response-function analysis only for the present year that supported the results of correlation analysis by identifying the precipitation, the SPEI and the REW of June as the most significant (Figure 8). In general, our results correspond to other studies describing spring/summer moisture availability as the main climatic driver of Pinus nigra growth in the Mediterranean [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72].…”
Section: Climate-growth Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore we conducted the response-function analysis only for the present year that supported the results of correlation analysis by identifying the precipitation, the SPEI and the REW of June as the most significant (Figure 8). In general, our results correspond to other studies describing spring/summer moisture availability as the main climatic driver of Pinus nigra growth in the Mediterranean [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72].…”
Section: Climate-growth Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This may have exceeded the ability of trees to tolerate water shortages and triggered a mass mortality of Black pine in the study area by a (secondary) fungal pathogen attack [22]. Similar abrupt mortality of pines has been described by several authors [66,70,73] where droughts in combination with unfavourable site conditions initiated mortality episodes through additional stressors such as defoliation by fungal pathogens. The values of recovery and relative resilience dropped again from the values of the period 2000-2003 implying that the further decline in growth could be the superimposed effect of previous droughts (Figure 11).…”
Section: Growth Response To Droughtssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Our analyses agree with previous studies on drought-induced mortality, indicating that climate-growth responses to climate depend on previous tree growth since declining trees show lower growth rates [4,53], although other studies have shown higher growth rates for declining or recently-dead trees prior to drought occurrence [18,28,54]. Low growth rates were caused by warming-induced drought stress; specifically, water deficit in spring, as documented in other Iberian pine forests [15].…”
Section: Climate-and Drought-growth Relationships In Planted and Natusupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Low rainfall in summer is often a factor limiting the incremental growth of Scots pine basically throughout all of its range (Lührte, 1991;Lindholm et al, 1997;Irvine et al, 1998;Cinnirella et al, 2002;Wilczyński and Skrzyszewski, 2003;Pensa et al, 2005;Tuovinen, 2005;Pilcher and Oberhuber, 2007;Piovesan et al, 2008;Gruber et al, 2010;Juknys et al, 2014). Drought is a factor which often induces variability in growth patterns and mortality of Scots pine especially in dry areas (Bigler et al, 2006, Hereş et al, 2012, Herguido et al, 2016, Marqués et al, 2016. Heavy rainfall during the growing season and, consequently, increased air humidity enhances the flow of water into the cells increasing the pressure on the cell wall, thus stretching these and causing cambium cell growth and it also provides the substrates for the process of photosynthesis (Major and Johnsen, 2001).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%