2020
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2020.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls On Deep-Water Sand Delivery Beyond the Shelf Edge: Accommodation, Sediment Supply, and Deltaic Process Regime

Abstract: Stratigraphic models typically predict accumulation of deep-water sands where coeval shelf-edge deltas are developed in reduced-accommodation and/or high-sediment-supply settings. On seismic data, these relationships are commonly investigated on a small number of clinothems, with a limited control on their lateral variability. Advanced full-volume seismic interpretation methods now offer the opportunity to identify high-order (i.e., 4th to 5th) seismic sequences (i.e., clinothems) and to evaluate the controls … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although their proposal is intended to explain morphologically distinct portions within a single lobate deposit, we extrapolate their process-response model and the concept of flow efficiency proposed by Mutti and Normark (1987) to illustrate the relationship between the mud-richness of contributing flows and the relative size and runout distance of lobate deposits (Figure 13). Consistent with this model, the implications of varying mud-richness in fluvial versus littoral drift sediment supply on the size and runout distance of lobate deposits have been documented by Paumard et al (2020). In addition, we propose that mud-poor flows produce poorly channelized lobate deposits whereas mud-rich stratified flows produce lobate deposits with a prominent distributary channel network (Figures 10,11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although their proposal is intended to explain morphologically distinct portions within a single lobate deposit, we extrapolate their process-response model and the concept of flow efficiency proposed by Mutti and Normark (1987) to illustrate the relationship between the mud-richness of contributing flows and the relative size and runout distance of lobate deposits (Figure 13). Consistent with this model, the implications of varying mud-richness in fluvial versus littoral drift sediment supply on the size and runout distance of lobate deposits have been documented by Paumard et al (2020). In addition, we propose that mud-poor flows produce poorly channelized lobate deposits whereas mud-rich stratified flows produce lobate deposits with a prominent distributary channel network (Figures 10,11).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Po River delta, Trincardi et al, 2019) | 197 EAGE PELLEGRINI Et aL. and 3-4 times shorter than wave-dominated clinothems of similar sandy sediment calibre, with mean gradients of ca 4° and ca 1°, respectively, and mean lengths of 150-230 m and 640-760 m. Similar relationships have been identified in the Early Cretaceous shelf margin of the North West Shelf (Australia) using seismic reflection data (Paumard et al, 2020).…”
Section: Clinoform Quantitative Parameters and Dynamic Indicessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…This topic is further dealt with in the U.S. Western Interior and Spitsbergen outcrops by Plink‐Bjorklund (2019). This author points out that river‐dominated sandstone‐prone clinothems are on average 3–4 times steeper and 3–4 times shorter than wave‐dominated clinothems of similar sandy sediment calibre, with mean gradients of ca 4° and ca 1°, respectively, and mean lengths of 150–230 m and 640–760 m. Similar relationships have been identified in the Early Cretaceous shelf margin of the North West Shelf (Australia) using seismic reflection data (Paumard et al, 2020).…”
Section: Research Avenue 3: Clinoform Quantitative Parameters and Dynsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The digital elevation model provides the full picture of modern sedimentary systems, from the source of the sediments (e.g., fluvial and carbonate systems) to their accumulation grounds along the shelf and in the basin. Parts of these modern systems can be used to better understand past sedimentary record (Paumard et al, 2020;Nyberg and Howell, 2016;Ainsworth et al, 2019), the geotechnical properties of marine sediments (Beemer et al, 2019;Beemer et al, 2018;Senders et al, 2013) or the geohazards affecting the area (Lane and Tyler, 2015;Hogan et al, 2017;Scarselli et al, 2019;Hengesh et al, 2013). Therefore, the integration of regional high-resolution bathymetry can constitute a step change and allow researchers to ponder their results with regard to the regional context and hence support the development of more reliable interpretations and models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%