2002
DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.2002.1878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Five Interest Inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the study by Savickas et al (2002), the second study examined the construct validity of the SII as compared to the Study of Values instrument (SOV; Allport, Vernon, & Lindzey, 1970) and a variety of other secondary, external criteria measures, such as the Adjective Check List (ACL; Gough & Heilbrun, 1983) and the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; Tellegen, 1982;Tellegen & Waller, in press and graduate students' regression equations, it was concluded that cross-validation evidence was found. The authors concluded that the SII has good convergent and discriminant validity (Schmidt et al, 1998).…”
Section: Strong Interest Inventory Validation Studiessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the study by Savickas et al (2002), the second study examined the construct validity of the SII as compared to the Study of Values instrument (SOV; Allport, Vernon, & Lindzey, 1970) and a variety of other secondary, external criteria measures, such as the Adjective Check List (ACL; Gough & Heilbrun, 1983) and the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; Tellegen, 1982;Tellegen & Waller, in press and graduate students' regression equations, it was concluded that cross-validation evidence was found. The authors concluded that the SII has good convergent and discriminant validity (Schmidt et al, 1998).…”
Section: Strong Interest Inventory Validation Studiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…One type of construct validity is convergent validity, which uses another measure of supposedly the same construct in addition to test scores on the instrument in question to establish that the instrument is truly measuring the construct it is purported to measure. Two studies investigated the convergent validity of the 1994 SII (Savickas, Taber, & Spokane, 2002;Schmidt, Lubinski, & Benbow, 1998 This study found both convergent and discriminant validity for the SII: evidence was found that scales that measured similar constructs were moderately correlated, whereas scales that measured dissimilar constructs exhibited lower correlations. In the MTMM, all correlations between measures were entered, separated by whether they were representing different or similar constructs, and then compared by blocks of correlation matrices.…”
Section: Strong Interest Inventory Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structure and content of the SVS has been validated in large, international studies (e.g., Schwartz & Bardi, 2001;Schwartz & Bilsky, 1987;Schwartz & Boehnke, 2004). The SGP also incorporates values domains not covered by the SVS but highlighted by other researchers, such as physical health and spirituality (Braithwaite & Law, 1985) and work (Rottinghaus, Coon, Gaffey & Zytowski, 2007;Savickas, Taber & Spokane, 2002). Examples of items are, "Having genuine, close friends" (Relationship), "Having authority, being in charge" (Power), "Being curious, discovering new things" (Self Direction) and "Being safe from danger" (Security).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ovim postupkom bi bilo moguće, pored procene veličine varijanse pravog skora, dobiti i procenu varijanse greške i procenu veličine varijanse metoda. Ovde će biti prikazan postupak MOMM analize (Campbell & Fiske, 1959), onako kako je operacionalizovan u radovima Savikasa, Tabera i Spokejna (Savickas, Taber, & Spokane, 2002) i Hedriha (Hedrih, 2008).…”
Section: Uvodunclassified